Adobe Acrobat Reader version 5 or later is required to view .pdf files    Free Download

NOTICE TO CLIENTS OR PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS
IMPORTANT - READ THIS CAREFULLY

        The attorney-client privilege no longer makes a lawyer's office "safe haven" for a client's statements pertaining to prior offenses which he or she does not want disclosed.  This is similar to the criminal case "Miranda warning".  Colorado Supreme Court disciplinary rules govern the conduct of all attorneys licensed in Colorado; this is not unique to my office nor to criminal defense attorneys - the rules apply to all Colorado attorneys.  If ethical and disciplinary rules are violated, proceedings are available to remove, suspend or censure every attorney's license to practice law.

        IF YOU HAVE A PRIOR OFFENSE WHICH YOU DO NOT WISH DISCLOSED TO PROSECUTORS, TO OPPOSING COUNSEL OR TO THE COURT, DO NOT INFORM THE ATTORNEY OR ANY STAFF IN THIS OFFICE. You will be asked relevant questions by the attorney or his staff. SIMPLY STATE YOU DO NOT WISH TO DISCUSS THOSE MATTERS AND NO FURTHER INQUIRY WILL BE MADE. No conclusion will be drawn from your request that inquiry be avoided. We will simply not discuss the subject.  The same applies to family law or debt collection matters.  If you or your employees have perpetrated unfair debt collection practices or have a prior offense admissible for impeachment purposes which you do not wish disclosed to opposing counsel or the court, do not inform the attorney or staff.   SIMPLY STATE YOU DO NOT WISH TO DISCUSS THOSE MATTERS AND AS ABOVE, NO FURTHER INQUIRY WILL BE MADE. Again, no conclusion will be drawn from your request that inquiry be avoided. We will simply not discuss the subject.

        IMPORTANT.  It is very dangerous for your defense attorney to have limited knowledge of relevant facts. The last place defense counsel should be educated is in the courtroom or by a prosecutor or opposing counsel. You may needlessly have a probation or deferred sentence revoked or consecutive jail sentences imposed. However, given the ethical and disciplinary rules which now govern Colorado attorneys, you may not wish to tell counsel all relevant facts, such as a prior conviction. This attorney recommends disclosure of prior offenses, unfair debt collection practices or other bad acts. If you give false information to the court, probation department, prosecutors or opposing counsel and are caught, sanctions will be extreme. Whether or not to disclose is the client's decision. If you exercise your right to remain silent, no false information is given.

        As a defense attorney, when a client has remained silent and has not perpetrated fraud on the court, I do not agree that confidentiality under the attorney-client relation is subordinate to the duty as an officer of the court to affirmatively inform the judge of prior criminal offenses.  Nor do I believe private attorneys or defense attorneys should be obligated to disclose history information received in a confidential setting.  My opinion, though, is not important.  I am an ethical attorney.  Colorado rules exist & I will not violate.  In fulfillment of my ethical obligations, even without specific knowledge, I recommend disclosure of prior or subsequent convictions, arrests or bad acts.

The most common circumstances in which this conflict may arise would be:
        1.  Prior DUI or alcohol related traffic conviction out of state and no felony convictions.  Absent a felony charge or conviction, the DUI may not show up on an NCIC records search.  If the out of state DMV has cleared you as eligible for a license, there would be nothing to show up in the DMV national holds registry.  Given that there is no national DMV record except for a.) adverse action holds and b.) commercial driver's license (CDL), the prior offense may be unknown to Colorado courts, prosecutors and probation officers.
        2.  Subsequent DUI or alcohol related traffic charges arising after entry of plea and alcohol evaluation, but before sentencing hearing.  All counties are linked into the Colorado Judiciary system - all types of cases including felony, misdemeanor and traffic cases.  Courts, prosecutors and probation officers have on-line access to judicial records.  However, if the new charges arose after plea and evaluation, the last opportunity to run a computer records check would be by the judge immediately before or at sentencing.  The judge may or may not search records.
        3.  In family law matters, an affirmative disclosure is required at suit commencement regarding prior allegations of domestic violence or child abuse allegations.  A discovery request would not be uncommon regarding other offenses or allegations, such as drugs, theft, etc.
        4.  This may also arise regarding family law or debtor claims of unfair debt collection practices.

        Shortly after being retained, but generally not thereafter due to cost, attorney may search some or all of the following records under the exact name provided by client:  Colorado state courts litigation history, Colorado Bureau of Investigation - CBI criminal records, Colorado driving record and perhaps multi-state databases for wants, warrants, arrests, convictions & sex offender.  I have no knowledge or reason to know if such matters are not disclosed by client, are not found in such databases and are not found in discovery provided by the prosecution or opposing counsel.

        In family law matters, this attorney specifically recommends that the matter be discussed with counsel prior to initiation of any suit or defense.  No one knows your prior history better than a spouse or significant other - they simply know where the skeletons are buried.  Better practice is to deal with those skeletons affirmatively rather than to attempt keeping them secreted.

        In debt collection matters, this attorney emphatically recommends that the matter be discussed with counsel prior to initiation of any suit.  Whereas criminal defendants have no choice but to participate in the justice system, creditors can generally decide whether to commence litigation or not.  It is possible the prudent business decision may be to charge off the account to bad debt and a collection learning experience.  

        Effective January 1, 1993 - under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (C.R.C.P.) if an attorney is aware of prior or subsequent arrest(s), criminal charge(s) or conviction(s) or other litigation or bad acts, the disciplinary rules place an affirmative duty on all attorneys to inform the court of relevant facts not before the judge, regardless of whether a litigant has given misinformation or not. Put simply, DEFENSE ATTORNEYS ARE NOW REQUIRED TO INFORM THE SENTENCING JUDGE AND OPPOSING COUNSEL OF PRIOR OFFENSES, ARRESTS OR BAD ACTS WITHIN THE ATTORNEY'S KNOWLEDGE.  Attorneys' obligation to deal fairly and with candor to the court supercedes the attorney - client privilege regarding communications.  In short,  upon gaining knowledge that a client is giving false information or relevant information is unknown to the court, these disciplinary rules required counsel to correct the records or to withdraw representation.  Withdrawal may be the only viable option.

C.R.C.P. §1.2(d)&(e) (scope and objectives of representation - fraud & prohibited conduct), §1.6 (confidentiality of information - attorney-client privilege), §3.1 (meritorious clams and contentions) and in particular, §3.3 (candor toward the tribunal - disclosure requirements). I also reviewed statutes, editor’s notes and annotations CRS 13-90-107(1)(b) (who may not testify without consent - attorney-client privilege).

Copyright © 1983 - All Rights Reserved - Document Revised: January 28, 2010
no copyright claimed to merchant logo, software logo, flag, envelope or drawing images