Seal Criminal Records
Home Up

GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE
Colorado Springs, Colorado    El Paso County
Robert D. Gustafson  *  Attorney at Law  *  Colorado Springs
  SEALING COLORADO CRIMINAL RECORDS

Email Attorney 

Attorney Vita

Phone (719) 260-1002
Fax (719) 260-1003  **  Toll Free (800) 410-1002
Hours Consultation Terms

Fees & Costs

Retainer Documents Driving Directions Maps to Attorney Travel * Trade Area * Courts
 
 

SEALING COLORADO CRIMINAL RECORDS
COLORADO SPRINGS CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY

sealing court records - prosecution records - law enforcement or police records

ATTORNEY HOMEPAGE

Sealing Colorado Criminal Justice Records - Colorado Equivalent to Expungement of Criminal Records
Sealing Criminal Records - Colorado Springs Attorney - felony offenses * misdemeanor offenses * petty offenses
Attorney Trial Practice 30+ years Colorado State Courts, Colorado Springs Municipal Court & Colorado DMV License Hearings & Appeals

first consultation terms - please read terms - representation inquiries invited & most welcome under terms set forth below
questions from the public seeking free advice or information are declined  **  please be prepared to retain and provide the criminal case court file for review
 
attorney does not accept installment payments  *  full payment is due at the time attorney is retained  *  major charge cards accepted
 

WEBPAGE INDEX

 

SEALING STATUTE ***  Consultation Policy  *** Minimum Threshold to Seal Prohibited Cases Not Eligible General Information
Procuring the Court File Attorney Review - Eligibility e-Filing Filing - Notice Final Hearing - Timing - Criteria - Court Order
Sealing Order Notice Serving Final Order - $$ Options Sealing Order - Effect Employment Law Not Offered Database Re-Sellers
Failure to Seal While Statute Permits Exceptions to Sealing Unsealing Records Unsealed Records
Deferred Sentence - Effect on Sealing Importance to Future Self Help & Mid Litigation Representation
Do I Need An Attorney? FBI Rapsheet - Information Records Request Forms Retainer Information Sheet Lawsuit Info Sheet
ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS
  Second Chance Law - limited to DRUG CONVICTIONS only  
representation limited to former clients
 

lawsuit to seal criminal justice records can only be brought in the county and state in which the underlying criminal charges were filed
you must go back to the original county for sealing relief   **   please do not call or email if your criminal case was not in Colorado

 

minimum threshold to seal  **  prohibited cases not eligible  **  procuring the court file  **  attorney review  **  attorney fees and costs  **  travel

 

FIRST CONSULTATION POLICY.  Voluminous phone calls mandated a restricted first consultation policy regarding sealing.

 

CONSULTATION - PRESENT OR FORMER CLIENTS.  Please feel free to call at any time regarding sealing of any criminal justice record.

CONSULTATION - NON-CLIENTS.  Attorney will conduct a phone consultation with a prospective new client only upon the following terms.

 

1.  Prospective client has provided to counsel the records referenced in procuring the court file.  Refer to terms of attorney review.
2.  Prospective client is looking to retain counsel, not necessarily this attorney, but nevertheless seeking representation.

3.  Prospective client has reviewed, approves and is prepared to pay attorney fees and
     costs plus travel time, mileage & travel expenses if case is outside El Paso County.

  click jitney for travel rates, mileage & costs
  one trip anticipated for final orders hearing

 

This is simply a no nonsense consultation policy regarding effective no nonsense representation.

 
above policy enables attorney to validly determine whether a sealing case has merit and whether attorney can assist
attorney assessment regarding eligibility for sealing criminal justice records will be emailed to you under the linked terms
review of the entire criminal case court file is necessary to determine whether the case is
eligible for sealing or not eligible
common fees are quoted on this page and information provided
attorney is prepared to provide legal representation
attorney comparison is understandable, but before calling
please be prepared to retain if I am counsel of your choice
 
Warning Right to Silence Search & Seizure Demeanor
Criminal Court Proceedings Felony Misdemeanor Municipal
Statutes of Limitations Speedy Trial  State Court  *  Muni Court
Affirmative Defenses Attacks  Jurisdictional  *  Collateral
Deferred Sentencing Sentencing Defense  Criminal  *  Traffic  *  DMV
Self Legal Research Accounting Legal Forms  On-Line * Hardcopy
Retainer Docs Client Docs Laymen Advice Disclaimer Notice
Independent Service Providers Alternatives Find A Lawyer
 ATTORNEY POLICIES
  Cases Outside Colorado Springs - Travel
 No Pro Bono Assistance  *  No Installment Payment
 Legal Advice Limited to Clients - Not General Public
 
Representation Now - Another Attorney or Self
 Attorney Representation & Declined Matters
 No Post Sentencing - Revocation or Appeal * Sealing Records
 
attorney does not accept criminal & traffic cases after sentencing unless he defended the underlying case
non-acceptance includes probation revocation, deferred sentence revocation, parole violation or appeal  **  eligible sealing and collateral attack cases accepted
 

GENERAL INFORMATION

 

        If you are reading this page, it is likely that at some point criminal charges were filed against you or a law enforcement agency initiated a criminal investigation.  You are likely interested in sealing criminal records - Colorado Springs or elsewhere in Colorado.  Every criminal investigation or criminal prosecution leaves a paper trail. The fact that no charges were filed, or if filed - that charges were dismissed or not guilty verdict entered does not erase this paper trail.  If you are eligible to seal criminal justice agency records, several good reasons for you to act as soon as possible.

 

    If criminal justice records are not sealed:


 

1.  You, persons with your written authorization, law enforcement agents, prosecutors, courts, probation officers and parole officers have access to the records, and likely the general public. 
        How difficult is it to locate criminal records?
           
Colorado Criminal History or On-Line Colorado Judiciary Records or El Paso County - District & County Court Records
Call, write or drop by the local court - request a name search - El Paso County Combined Courts record request form which may be submitted via fax
                Not only is detailed information available, quite likely the court file is accessible on demand.

   

 

2.  If a subsequent criminal investigation of a similar nature arises, law enforcement officers are more likely to arrest, and prosecutors are more likely to charge plus less likely to dismiss or offer a favorable plea agreement.  Did it before, did it again.

   

 

3.  If subsequent charges are filed for an offense of a similar nature arises, prosecutors may seek to introduce evidence of the current investigation or criminal prosecution, even if charges were not filed at this time or the current case was dismissed.  They may argue admissibility of the current matter under theories of common plan-scheme-design, identity, modus operandi, motive, guilty knowledge, intent, lack of mistake, accident, legal justification (self defense, defense of property, lawful child discipline) or impeachment of witness credibility.  While the jury would be instructed as to the limited purpose for the evidence, jurors may think - Did it before, did it again. 
                Brief information is included regarding admissibility - refer to admissibility link.
                If subsequent charges are filed for an offense of a similar nature arises, prosecutors may seek to introduce evidence of the current investigation or criminal prosecution at the time of sentencing even if charges were not filed at this time or the current case was dismissed.  Prosecutors may  attempt use as an aggravating factor - requesting increase the seriousness of penalties.

 

        You may have the right to file a separate civil lawsuit in District Court requesting that criminal justice agency records be sealed.  Sealing does not happen automatically. Sealing criminal records Colorado Springs - courts in El Paso County require a separate civil lawsuit to be filed for each matter to be sealed.

 

lawsuit to seal criminal justice records can only be brought in the county and state in which the underlying criminal charges were filed
you must go back to the original county for sealing relief   **   consult an attorney in the state of the underlying criminal case

MINIMUM THRESHOLD REQUIRED TO SEAL

please read before calling the attorney

if the court imposed sentence, the case is not eligible for sealing
calling an attorney will not change that - call your Colorado legislator
RELEVANT STATUTES CRS 24-72-308  * sealing of criminal justice agency records
CRS 24-72-302  * definitions CRS 24-72-309  * violation - penalty Retainer Data Sheet Lawsuit Data Sheet
 

1. After investigation, the matter was dropped without filing criminal charges.

OR

 

2. After prosecution was initiated, all charges in the criminal case were dismissed.  This includes but not limited to evidentiary suppression, nolle, nolle prosequi, insufficient evidence, dismissal, straight dismissal, flat dismissal, or successful completion of a deferred sentence and subsequent dismissal.

AND

a. You did not waive your rights to petition to seal in plea negotiation.  El Paso County DA Office has a sealing waiver pre-printed into misdemeanor deferred sentence agreements.  Many felony deferred sentence agreements are custom drafted and contain a similar clause.  If such a clause exists, the right to seal is gone unless perhaps grounds exist for a collateral attack. Place to begin - carefully read your deferred sentence agreement looking for the word waive, waives, waived and also the numbers CRS 24-72-308.

AND

b. For dispositions involving investigation but non-filing or dismissal as a result of a plea agreement in another case, the uncharged offense investigation records or flat dismissal would be eligible for sealing 10 years after the date of final disposition of all criminal proceedings if no new criminal charges have been brought during the 10 years.  CRS 42-72-308(1)(a)(III) - 2004 amendment permitted sealing and 2008 amendment reduced window from 15 years to 10 years.

 

Note:  DUI, DEAC & DWAI as well as driving under restraint are classified as misdemeanors - criminal charges - as well as some other traffic matters.
Counsel construes the traffic sealing exceptions to exclude traffic related misdemeanors from sealing eligibility.  Exercise care if relevant.

OR

 

3. After prosecution was initiated, a judge or jury entered a verdict of not guilty on all charges

 

NOTE
 
 
 
 
 

 

CASES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR SEALING PURSUANT TO COLORADO LAW

To be eligible to seal, a case must fall within the above criteria

If you entered a guilty plea or were found guilty at trial and the court imposed sentence on any charge, the criminal court case is not eligible to seal criminal justice records.  If you were sentenced to probation or received a straight jail sentence on any charge in the case, no charge in the case is eligible for sealing.  If this exists, please don't call hoping you will hear something different.  It never hurts to obtain a second opinion from a different attorney.

Deferred sentence is another matter - this type of disposition may be eligible for sealing.  If you waived sealing rights in the deferred sentence plea disposition, counsel will decline sealing representation.  Unfortunately, counsel finds this type of waiver clause in most deferred sentence agreements, particularly in El Paso County due to DA Office policy.  Eligibility can only be determined by review of the court file.

Collateral attack may be possible - refer to link

Drug conviction - second chance law - refer to link

If uncertain of final disposition and you think perhaps eligible, procure the court file, submit the entire court file for attorney review and call.

SEX OFFENDER.  Conviction of an offense for which the factual basis was unlawful sexual behavior as defined in CRS 16-22-102(9) is not eligible for sealing.  Refer to CRS 24-72-308(3)(c).  This attorney interprets the statute to prohibit sealing of any amended charge to which plea is entered, including records of the original sex offender charge.  Given that a petition to seal would be dismissed by the Court prior to setting a hearing, this attorney would decline representation in such circumstance.  You may consult other counsel.

If the entire case was either not filed, dismissed or not guilty verdict entered as to all counts, feel free to submit your court file for review.

WAIVER OF RIGHTS TO SEAL CLAUSE - DEFERRED SENTENCE AGREEMENT
 

All deferred sentence plea agreements with the El Paso County DA Office contain a standard clause that the defendant agrees "to give up any future right I may have, whether provided by C.R.S. 24-72-308 or by any other law, to have those records sealed by court order."  This has been in the El Paso DA Office deferred sentence agreements for decades and must be eliminated in plea negotiations, or the deferred agreement will contain such a clause.  Prosecutors in other counties or jurisdictions may or may not have such a clause "pre-canned" into their deferred sentence agreements or may insert for any particular case.
 
In an appeal from a sealing case originating in El Paso County, the deferred sentencing agreement contained the above standard clause in the underlying criminal case.  The criminal case was later dismissed in compliance with the provisions of CRS 18-1.3-102(2) and the terms of the stipulation.  Defendant later filed a petition to seal criminal justice records.  The DA Office objected.  The District Court rejected the People's argument on the ground that the waiver provisions of the plea agreement are "opposed to public policy" and granted the petition.  Appeal to the Court of Appeals followed and the appellate court ruled as follows.  People v. Ward-Garrison, 72 P.3d 423 (Colo. App. 2003)

1. A trial court lacks authority under these statutory provisions to act unilaterally to modify the terms of such an agreement without the district attorney's consent.  People v. C.G., 12 P.3d 861 (Colo.App. 2000).  No such consent was given here.

 

2. Defendant's waiver of his future right to challenge prior convictions made as part of plea agreement did not violate public policy and was valid and enforceable in subsequent proceedings.  People v. Gurule, 748 P.2d 1329 (Colo.App. 1987)

 

3. The appellate court views the 1996 amendments as reflecting a broad public policy against the sealing of criminal records in situations involving a favorable disposition to the defendant under a plea agreement, especially when, as here, the defendant has admitted committing a crime, received the benefit of the bargain, and offered no suggestion that the express waiver was otherwise invalid.

 

4. Public policy favors the enforcement of defendant's express waiver of her statutory right to request the sealing of the criminal record in this case.

 

5. The waiver of rights to seal clause was upheld and the case was remanded to the District Court for denial of the petition to seal criminal justice records.

 

The Teller County DA Office is staffed by the El Paso County DA Office - 4th Judicial District.  Deferred sentence agreements follow the same pattern as indicated above.
 
Shortly after Ward-Garrison, supra, an appeal was taken from a sealing case in Teller County; the deferred sentencing agreement in the underlying criminal case contained the above standard clause.  As above, the criminal case was later dismissed in compliance with the provisions of CRS 18-1.3-102(2) and the terms of the stipulation.  Defendant later filed a petition to seal criminal justice records.  At hearing on the petition to seal, Petitioner argued that CRS 16-7-303 and CRE 410, which prohibits the admission of plea negotiations in civil actions, barred the district court from considering the waiver.  Petitioner also argued that the waiver provision was a contract of adhesion and therefore unenforceable.  The DA Office objected.  The District Court rejected the Petitioner’s claims under CRS 16-7-303 and CRE 410.  The appellate court ruled as follows.  Walker-Lawrence v. District Court in and for Teller County, 74 P.3d 521 (Colo. App. 2003)

1. Public policy favors the enforcement of a defendant's express waiver of her statutory right to request the sealing of criminal records, where the defendant received a favorable disposition and the benefit of the bargain under a plea agreement.  The Ward-Garrison division concluded that CRS 18-1.3-102(2), which provides that a defendant who enters into a deferred sentencing agreement "is obligated to adhere to such stipulation," requires that the terms of such stipulations be enforced.  The division noted that a trial court lacks authority under these statutory provisions to act unilaterally to modify the terms of such an agreement without the district attorney's consent.  No such consent was given here.

 

2. The Court of Appeals rejected petitioner's evidentiary arguments that the terms of the plea agreement are not admissible in this proceeding to seal the record.  CRE 410 prohibits the admission of evidence of a guilty plea later withdrawn or statements made by a defendant during plea negotiations in subsequent proceedings against the defendant.  Likewise, CRS 16-7-303 makes statements made in the course of plea negotiations inadmissible against or in favor of the defendant in subsequent proceedings.

 

3. These provisions do not bar discovery of the terms of the deferred sentence and judgment.  Because CRS 18-1.3-102(2) clearly provides that a defendant who enters into a deferred sentencing agreement is obligated to adhere to such stipulation, the trial court must be permitted to review the terms of the agreement to determine whether the defendant is in compliance with those terms. Nor is the sentencing agreement being used in a proceeding against petitioner.  Thus, CRE 410 and CRS 16-7-303 are inapplicable.  Petitioner's contention that these provisions somehow modify a contract which has already been performed is not supported by established precedent.

 

4. Moreover, because Petitioner has received the benefit of the bargain she made, we perceive no basis in public policy to now allow her to renege on that portion of the agreement expressly waiving the right to request the sealing of the record.  See People v. Ward-Garrison, supra.

 

Attorney has set forth these cases to emphasize that counsel will decline a sealing case wherein the deferred sentencing agreement in the underlying criminal case contains a waiver by defendant of his or rights to seal criminal justice records.  It is counsel's opinion that such a sealing case would be summarily dismissed.  Important as sealing may be to a person with concurrent motivation to pay attorney's fees, counsel simply will not accept a client's money with knowledge that dismissal is foreseeable and that the merits of the case will never be reached.
 
Counsel has repeatedly heard from prospective clients that he or she did not understand the meaning of the clause or was unaware of it's existence in the deferred sentencing agreement which he or she signed.  Invariably the 6 month statute of limitations upon collateral attack has more than lapsed by the time the person considers sealing criminal justice records.  The only means by which counsel can envision a sealing waiver passing the statutory eligibility threshold is for the criminal defendant / sealing petitioner to obtain from the DA Office prior consent to rescission of his or her waiver and prior consent to sealing.  Counsel considers that possibility to be virtually non-existent and declines such cases.

 

SECOND CHANCE LAW

LIMITED TO PRIOR DRUG CONVICTIONS

 

        Sealing drug conviction lawsuits are significantly more complex than a regular sealing case.  Fingerprint background check must be procured, lawsuit preparation is required for DA Office consent, likely a new fingerprint background check due to time expiration, then filing with the court and hearing.  This is a costly process; more so than standard sealing cases.  Attorney hourly fees.  Attorney flat fee: $2,500  **  costs estimated: $2,000  **  total trust deposit to retain: $4,500.  If elected, hourly fees may likely exceed the attorney flat fee.

 

        CONSULTATION / REPRESENTATION POLICY.    Due to effort required and costs, counsel has limited consultation and representation to existing or former clients regarding drug conviction sealing cases.

 

   Present clients or former clients.  Please feel free to call or email.

 

Persons who are not current or former clientsAttorney does not offer consultation or representation to persons who are not current or former clients.  Please do not call or email - consultation will be immediately declined without further discussion.

 
 
*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *
SECOND CHANCE LAW

Sealing eligibility for sealing drug convictions commences with convictions on or after July 1, 2008.  Convictions prior to that date are not eligible.  The statutes are quite restrictive.  Non-drug related convictions - this does not apply and is not relief.   Perhaps the Colorado Legislature will subsequently consider a second chance law for other types of convictions, but - not yet - not today.

2008 LAW
amended 2011

CRS 24-72-308.5
CRS 24-72-308.6

FILING - NOTICE 
e-Filing availability and court mandatory requirements

 

        MULTIPLE CASES - Separate Sealing Lawsuit Filing Per Criminal Case to be Sealed
        The court requires a separate sealing lawsuit to be filed per criminal case to be sealed, even if all cases occurred in one county.  This court policy is inflexible.  Several years ago attorney filed one civil sealing lawsuit to seal three criminal cases within El Paso County.  The filing was rejected by the Clerk of Court and separate sealing lawsuits were subsequently filed for each criminal case.  To save the client money, this attorney filed with the Court, and folks - that bird won't fly.

 

Multiple Cases to Seal - Practical Application of Court Policy

 

        1.  A separate sealing lawsuit must be prepared by counsel for each criminal case to be sealed.  Counsel has no control over Colorado judiciary policy.

        2.  A statutory filing fee is charged by the Clerk of Court to file civil lawsuit.  For each sealing suit filed, the court filing fee doubles, triples, etc.  Same applies to court e-Filing and e-Service expenses, court copy expenses and court certification.

        3.  U.S. Mail certified mailing costs double, triple, etc. for the initial notice of filing and hearing.

        4.  If a criminal justice agency must be e-Served via fax, costs double, triple, etc.  Similarly if a criminal justice agency must be personally served with a certified copy of the final sealing order, then court copy costs, court certification costs and process server costs double, triple, etc.

        5.  Contrary to what one might think, it's easier to prepare two sealing lawsuits for two different clients than to prepare two sealing lawsuits for the same client.  Attorney fees double, triple, etc. with multiple sealing lawsuit filings.  No "twofer freebies" - the work is there - so are the attorney fees & costs

if unacceptable, don't call this attorney to wrangle a deal - seek no billing legal services elsewhere
every conceivable manipulation to lower fees & costs has been tried through the years by prospective clients - it simply doesn't work

        6.  If you were a naughty boy or girl and have multiple criminal cases to seal, the fiddler's bill is now coming due for the dancing done in bygone days.

 

        Initial Court Review:  Denial Without Hearing
        Upon the filing of a petition, the court shall review the petition and determine whether there are grounds under this section to proceed to a hearing on the petition.  If the court determines that the petition on its face is insufficient or if the court determines that, after taking judicial notice of matters outside the petition, the petitioner is not entitled to relief under this section, the court shall enter an order denying the petition and mail a copy of the order to the petitioner.  The court's order shall specify the reasons for the denial of the petition   CRS 24-72-308(1)(b)(II)(A)

 

        Initial Court Review:  Hearing To Be Set
        At the time of filing of a petition, if the court does not determine that grounds exist on the face of the petition at that time for the court to deny the request to seal, the court is required to set a date for a hearing.  CRS 24-72-308(1)(b)(II)(A)

 

        Initial Notice to Agencies with Records to Seal
        If the court determines that the petition is sufficient on its face and that no other grounds exist at that time for the court to deny the petition under this section, the court shall set a date for a hearing and the petitioner shall notify the prosecuting attorney by certified mail, the arresting agency, and any other person or agency identified by the petitioner.  CRS 24-72-308(1)(b)(II)(B)

 

        The statutory language is ambiguous.  Does the statute require service by certified mail upon all agencies or just the prosecuting attorney?  It makes a great deal of difference in postage expense and time expended preparing certified mail.  Courts in El Paso County have interpreted the statute to require notice by certified mail only upon prosecutors, and notice to the remaining agencies with records to seal may be given via e-Service or regular U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid, evidenced by a certificate of mailing.  Courts in other counties may differ and require notice to all agencies by certified mail.

FINAL ORDERS HEARING
TIMING - CRITERIA - COURT ORDER

 
APPROXIMATE TIMING
 

Attorney has published documents which facilitate preparation of a retainer agreement and the lawsuit.

        1.  Link to retainer agreement data information sheet.  Document is not password protected.  The completed form may be faxed to the attorney for preparation of a proposed fee agreement.  Retainer agreement will be emailed to prospective client within 1-2 business days; generally the evening of receipt.

        2.  Link to sealing lawsuit information sheet.  Document is password protected.  Password is provided to a client to expedite preparation of the petition to seal criminal justice records.  Client may drop off, mail, fax or email the completed information form to counsel. 

        3.  From the time counsel has received the executed fee agreement, trust deposit payment and the completed lawsuit information sheet, within a week to 10 business days attorney will prepare the petition to seal criminal justice records and forward to the client in .pdf format (Adobe Reader ver. 5 or above). 

        4.  When client has executed the petition to seal, the original document can be returned to counsel via FedEx overnight.  e-Filing with the court generally occurs within 1 business day from receipt; frequently the evening of receipt.  Client's geographic distance need not pose a problem in lawsuit preparation or e-Filing.

        5.  e-Filing acceptance commonly occurs within 1-3 business days from electronic submission; sometimes the same day.  At that time, a case number is available and the Court division has been assigned.  It is then possible to call the division clerk for a hearing date.  Final orders hearing is frequently set approximately 30 days from the date of setting with the division clerk.

        6.  The court now e-Serves the final sealing order upon counsel; frequently within 1-3 business days from hearing date and sometimes the same day.  Counsel will then e-file and can e-Serve a notice and certificate of service.  If e-Served, immediately up e-Filing the agencies receive immediate notice and an electronic file of the sealing order.  Actual sealing of the records by the agencies depends upon how backlogged the agencies' records custodians may be.

        7.  From the time client requests representation, it would not be uncommon to have a final order within approximately 6 weeks & actual sealing within 2+ months.

 

CRITERIA - SEALING COURT ORDER

 

        In making a determination, the trial court should consider the severity of the offense sought to be sealed, the time which has elapsed since the conviction, the subsequent criminal history of the petitioner, and the need for the government agency to retain the records.  D.W.M. v. District Court, 751 P.2d 74 (Colo. 1988); People v. Bushu, 876 P.2d 106 (Colo. App. 1994).  The court may also consider factors relating to the strength of the case, petitioner's age and employment history, and various consequences if the records are not sealed.  The balance test allows for consideration of other factors on a case-by-case  basis.  Bushu, supra.

 

        If after the hearing is conducted the court finds that the harm to the privacy of the petitioner or dangers of unwarranted adverse consequences to the petitioner outweigh the public interest in retaining the records, the court may order such records to be sealed.  By law, basic identification information will not be sealed.  CRS 24-72-308(1)(c)

        The statute indicates the general assembly's intent to preserve the complete criminal justice record, but in a form that protects the individual named from any harmful effects.  Physical destruction of records not generally allowed.  By fashioning the remedy of sealing records, the general assembly did not intend that the physical destruction of the records also be allowed in most situations.  People v. Wright, 43 Colo. App. 30, 598 P.2d 157 (1979).

 

        Counsel prepares and e-Files an affidavit of the petitioner setting forth with specificity the privacy interest harm suffered.  This gives notice to the Court and to the DA Office of harm prior to the judge taking the bench at hearing on the merits.  Exhibits may be attached to the affidavit, such as employment rejection letters and the like.  Background check documents (Colorado state courts litigation history, CBI history, national criminal records search and if PIN is available, Colorado driving record) are available in hardcopy at hearing for introduction into evidence if relevant or needed.

SEALING ORDER - NOTICE
method of serving the final sealing order has significant impact upon cost and upon probability of compliance - actual sealing
agency records request forms - access limited to clients
 

        1.  A copy of the order is to be provided to the custodian of record of each agency named in the petition CRS 24-72-308(1)(b)(II).  The Clerk of Court in the sealing civil case receives notice via the sealing order itself.  If records of a different court are being sealed, notice would have to be given to the other Court Clerk.  e.g. municipal court

 

         2.  Records Custodian Failure to Seal - Misdemeanor.  Any person who willfully and knowingly fails to seal is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than ninety days, or by both such fine and imprisonment.  CRS 24-72-309

 

        3.  Multiple options are exist regarding notice and service of the sealing order upon the agencies with criminal justice records. 
             Usually 8 - 14 agencies are named in a petition to seal.  Now we must also contend with additional information database re-sellers.

 
METHOD OF SERVING SEALING ORDER AND FORM OF SEALING ORDER
 

        Service of the final sealing order may be made upon the criminal justice agencies by: 1) e-File and Serve.  2) personal service of process by a process server.  3)  U.S. Mail - certified mail.  4) U.S. Mail - regular mail.

 

        Options re form of final sealing order to be served:  1) electronic copy containing court filing stamp & judge's approval  2) certified copy  3) regular photocopy

 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Electronic copy of the final sealing order - received by counsel from the court via email - no cost. 

e-Service via email is less costly than fax e-Service.

Certified copies & process service.  Certified copies from the court are $0.75 per page copy cost plus $20 per certification (two copies per agency if personally served).  Additionally, fees & costs to a process server may run $55 - $100 per agency served.  If personal service of final orders certified by the court was required upon all agencies, $1,200+ could be added to costs estimated herein.

Attorney makes every effort to utilize e-Service and avoid personal service wherever possible.

 

        Attorney will not serve the final order via USPS certified mail or regular mail.  Such service leaves the door open for too many variables which may result in one or more criminal justice agencies not sealing the records.

 

        If accepted by a criminal justice agency, attorney will serve an electronic copy of the final order via e-File and Serve.  In El Paso County, all agencies will accept e-Service.  Only the probation department in El Paso County requires e-Service via fax; the remainder accept via email.  CBI accepts e-Service via email.  FBI NCIC obtains records from each state agency (here CBI) and therefore the sealing order is not served upon FBI NCIC.

 

        Options where any criminal justice agency declines to accept accepted service of an electronic copy of the final order by e-File and Serve.

 

If counsel can ascertain the criminal justice agency records department fax number, e-Service via fax will be will utilized regardless of agency consent. 

        Counsel has yet to to encounter the problem, but if an agency refused to seal upon receipt of an electronic copy of the final sealing order via fax and demanded a certified copy, counsel would move for court ruling on such issue.  Service via the court appointed agent e-File and Serve of an electronic order containing the court seal should constitute validation.

 

On occasion, the records department of a criminal justice agency adamantly refuses to provide an email address or fax number.  If counsel can not ascertain a records department fax, attorney will cause a certified copy of the sealing order to be personally upon the criminal justice agency by a professional process server.  This significantly increases cost.  Usually records custodians are quite pleasant and cooperative, however some can be "stinky stinkers" to quote Bloody Mary from South Pacific.  Easy or difficult, final order process will be accomplished.

 

        e-Service via email is utilized if available to avoid e-Service fax costs.  Personal service of a certified copy of the final sealing order is utilized only as a last resort.  When sealing outside El Paso County, it is a agency by agency basis regarding method of service.  Counsel will attempt to save cost wherever possible.

        4.  Sealing Confirmation.  Based upon easy internet accessibility, at the time of closing file counsel conducts an on-line check of Colorado State Courts litigation history and CBI history to ascertain records are sealed and unavailable.  Counsel advises each client to attempt to procure records from each other agency 30 days after entry of the sealing order to verify that records are in fact not accessible.  Please refer to the below links for information regarding searching the FBI "rap sheet" and client records requests to law enforcement agencies.

 
FBI Records Request Information Generic Law Enforcement Agency Records Request Form
  FBI Records Request Form CBI Records Request Form
link to FBI information available to general public records request forms restricted to clients - call or email for password
 
MINIMUM THRESHOLD TO SEAL
please read before calling counsel
COURT RECORDS PROCUREMENT
please read before calling counsel
ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT
please read before calling counsel
ATTORNEY'S FEE
attorney fee before costs

2011 STATUTORY AMENDMENT
Information Database Re-Sellers

 

        The statutory amendment enacted in 2011 merely provides for electronic notification of the sealing order and service of the final sealing order upon private custodians (information database re-sellers) of criminal justice agency records or Colorado Judiciary records.  People in all states joke about the wisdom of their state legislature, and laws are frequently enacted restricting civil liberties or favorable to government while adverse to citizenry.  The Colorado Legislature did something good here.  Sealing wouldn't be accomplished if information re-sellers continue to retain and sell data referencing sealed records subsequent to sealing order.

From counsel's perspective, there was one major glitch with the 2011 amendment.  The citizen - sealing lawsuit petitioner is burdened with giving notice and a copy of the sealing order to private custodians of criminal justice records (information resellers).  Who are they??? - the internet is a big place.  Colorado Judiciary, CBI, Colorado Department of Revenue, etc. have let contacts with private database companies and know the identity and contact information for such vendors.  It would have made sense to place the burden upon the criminal justice agencies to notify their information dissemination vendors of the sealing order, but our legislature chose to place the burden upon the petitioner.  Makes life a little more difficult, now doesn't it?

SEALING ORDER - EFFECT
 

        Upon the entry of an order to seal the records, the petitioner and all criminal justice agencies may properly reply, upon any inquiry in the matter, that no such records exist with respect to such person. An individual may deny his past criminal record. CRS 24-72-308 clearly allows an individual to deny past criminal involvement if the criminal record has been sealed pursuant to the statute. D.W.M., supra, Bushu, supra.

 
POTENTIAL IMPORTANCE TO A PERSON'S FUTURE

Employers, educational institutions, state and local government agencies, officials, and employees may not, in any application or interview or in any other way, require an applicant to disclose any information contained in sealed records. An applicant need not, in answer to any question concerning arrest and criminal records information that has been sealed, include a reference to or information concerning such sealed information and may state that no such action has ever occurred. Such an application may not be denied solely because of the applicant's refusal to disclose arrest and criminal records information that has been sealed.  CRS 24-72-308(1)(f)(I)

EXCEPTIONS TO SEALING

 

By law, basic identification information will not be sealed.  CRS 24-72-308(1)(c)

"Basic identification information" is limited to the name, place and date of birth, last-known address, social security number, occupation and address of employment, physical description, photograph, handwritten signature, sex, fingerprints, and any known aliases of any person. CRS 24-72-302(2).

 

Exception to sealing re law enforcement agency inquiry.

This section shall not apply to arrest and criminal justice information or criminal justice records in the possession and custody of a criminal justice agency when inquiry concerning the arrest and criminal justice information or criminal justice records is made by another criminal justice agency.  CRS 24-72-308(3)(d)

Put another way, if a person is subsequently investigated for another crime, law enforcement officers will be able to view records of the sealed matter.  Use by prosecutors would only be permitted if prosecutors petitioned to unseal records & the petition was granted by the court.  CRS 24-72-308(1)(e)

 

Records which are exempt from the statute and may not be sealed.  CRS 24-72-308(3)
        1. Any class 1 or class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense
        2. Any class A or class B traffic infraction; or
        3. DUI, DEAC or DWAI
        4. Conviction records for unlawful sexual behavior as defined in CRS 18-3-412.5(1)
                - registered sex offenders
        5. All records when inquiry is made by another criminal justice agency

Additionally, the DMV is required to keep a separate file of all abstracts of court records regarding dismissals and lesser alcohol offense or non-alcohol offense convictions where the original charges were alcohol or drug related traffic charges, i.e.: DUI, DEAC or DWAI. CRS 42-2-121(2)(b)  These separate records are available only to criminal justice agencies. 

 

Exception to the exception - DUI - DEAC - DWAI  charge - minor under age 21 and BAC below 0.05
42-4-1715. Convictions, judgments, and charges recorded - public inspection. 
         (1)(a) Every judge of a court not of record and every clerk of a court of record shall keep a full record of every case in which a person is charged with any violation of this article or any other law regulating the operation of vehicles on highways.
            (b)   (I) Upon application by a person, the court shall expunge all records concerning a conviction of the person for driving any vehicle in this state with an alcohol level of at least 0.02 but not more than 0.05 grams of alcohol per hundred milliliters of blood or at least 0.02 but not more than 0.05 grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of breath while under twenty-one years of age pursuant to section 42-4-1301 (2) (a.5) if:
                            (A) Such person presents a request for expungement to the court and provides all information required by the court to process such request;
                            (B) Such person is over twenty-one years of age and the court action regarding the offense has been concluded;
                            (C) The person has not been convicted for any other offense under section 42-4-1301 that was committed while such person was under twenty-one years of age; and
                            (D) Such person pays the fine and surcharge for such conviction and completes any other requirements of the court with regard to such conviction, including, but not limited to, any order to pay restitution to any party.
                    (II) Upon receiving a request for expungement, the court may delay consideration of such request until sufficient time has elapsed to ensure that the person is not convicted for any additional offense under section 42-4-1301 committed while the person was under twenty-one years of age.
        (2) Within ten days after the entry of a judgment, conviction, or forfeiture of bail of a person upon a charge of violating any provision of this article or other law regulating the operation of vehicles on highways, the judge or clerk of the court in which the entry of a judgment was made or the conviction was had or bail was forfeited shall prepare and immediately forward to the department an abstract of the record of said court covering every case in which said person had a judgment entered against him or her, was so convicted, or forfeited bail, which abstract must be certified by the person so required to prepare the same to be true and correct.
        (3) Said abstract must be made upon a form furnished by the department and shall include the name, address, and driver's license number of the party charged, the registration number of the vehicle involved, the nature of the offense, the date of hearing, the plea, the judgment or whether bail forfeited, and the amount of the fine or forfeiture.
        (4)(a) Every court of record shall also forward a like report to the department:
                    (I) Upon the conviction of any person of vehicular homicide or any other felony in the commission of which a vehicle was used; and
                    (II) Upon the dismissal of a charge for a violation of section 42-4-1301 (1) or (2) or if the original charge was for a violation of section 42-4-1301 (1) or (2) and the conviction was for a non-alcohol- or non-drug-related traffic offense.
            (b) Every juvenile court shall forward a like report to the department upon the adjudication of delinquency of any juvenile based upon conduct which would establish vehicular homicide if committed by an adult.
        (5) The department shall keep all abstracts received under this section, as well as a record of penalty assessments received, at the main office, and the same shall be public records and subject to the provisions of section 42-1-206.

UNSEALING RECORDS

        Prosecutors may subsequently petition the court to unseal the records. Inspection of the records included in an order sealing criminal records may thereafter be permitted by the court only upon petition by the person who is the subject of such records or by the prosecuting attorney and only for those purposes named in such petition.  CRS 24-72-308(1)(e)

FAILURE TO SEAL WHILE STATUTE PERMITS

In a case where:
        1. The sealing statute was amended - restricting rights to seal, and
        2. Petitioner's records could have sealed records under the former statute
        3.  Under the amended statute, Petitioner did not meet the criteria to seal records
        4.  Petitioner failed to request sealing until after amendment
        5. Petitioner did not qualify for sealing under the new statute - request denied

        The court ruled the opportunity to petition and to have the balancing test applied in a hearing under this section is not a vested or a substantive right, application of the amended statute to the petitioner did not violate the constitutional prohibition against retrospective legislation (law not ex post facto), and the petition was denied under the new statute. People v. D.K.B., 843 P.2d 1326 (Colo. 1993); E.J.R. v. District Court, County of Boulder, 892 P.2d 222 (Colo. 1995).

        The sealing statute has been amended multiple times, each becoming more restrictive and limiting the circumstances under which criminal justice agency records can be sealed. The above cases demonstrate - seal now while you can. If the law is changed later and you haven't sealed - tough luck - should have acted sooner.

        Applicable Maxim:
        Recommendation:
If you snooze, you lose.
If the remedy is available, file the petition to seal criminal justice records now.

DEFERRED SENTENCE
DISPOSITION - EFFECT ON SEALING RECORDS

        If you enter into a deferred sentence agreement, sentencing is delayed for the period of time agreed. Upon your satisfactory completion of all conditions of the deferred sentence, your plea of guilt will be withdrawn and the deferred charge(s) will be dismissed.

    1. All Charges Deferred and/or Dismissed.
        a. If you entered a plea of guilt or nolo contendere - no contest (deferred) to the only charge or all charges, the entire case will be dismissed. This will be done automatically by the Court without further action on your part so long as you satisfactorily comply with conditions set forth in your deferred sentence agreement. You may be able seal records of the criminal case.
        b. Review your deferred sentence agreement. Paragraph no. 7 of the deferred sentence form pre-printed by the El Paso County District Attorney’s Office contains the following clause:
                As a part of this stipulation, the Defendant agrees to give up any future right he / she may have, whether provided by CRS 24-72-308 or by any other law, to have the record of this deferred judgment to be sealed by Court order.
                    I. If your deferred sentence agreement contains no such waiver clause or the clause was stricken from the agreement, you may petition to seal criminal justice records.
                    II. If your deferred sentence agreement does contains such clause, at the time of the plea agreement you waived your rights to seal, and you are prohibited from petitioning to seal criminal justice records.  The fact you failed to carefully read the agreement will not likely be sufficient to set the plea aside, and if 6 months has elapsed you are likely barred by a statute of limitations from bringing a collateral attack on the plea.

    2. Plea to Deferred + Straight Plea of Guilt.  If you entered a plea of guilt or nolo contendere - no contest (deferred) to any charge(s) and also entered a straight plea of guilt to any charge(s), by statute you are not eligible to seal records of the case or any charges therein.  Conviction on the straight plea precludes you from sealing.  

    3.  Exceptions.  If your case falls into one the exceptions noted above, you may not petition to seal records.

EVIDENCE OF PRIOR BAD ACTS
SIMILAR TRANSACTIONS
POTENTIAL USES OF UNSEALED RECORDS
 

    1.  CRS 24-72-305.3  Charitable organization volunteers or employees - including volunteer's at your child's or grandchild's school or organized social activities

 

    2.  CRS 24-72-305.4  Governmental access - licensing - applicants or licensees - regulated professions or occupations - professional licensing

 

    3.  CRS 16-10-301     Evidence of similar transactions - sexual offenses

 

    4.  CRS 18-6-810.5    Evidence of similar transactions - domestic violence

 

    5.  CRS 13-90-101     Who may testify - interest

Impeachment

 

    6.  CRS 13-90-106     Testimony - exceptions

Persons of unsound mind

 

Children under age 10 - testimony permitted in child abuse, sexual abuse, sexual assault & incest allegations

 

    7.  CRS 13-90-107     Privileged communications

Husband-wife, physician, surgeon, registered professional nurse, psychologist, clergyman, minister, priest, rabbi, certified public accountant, CRS 19-1-103(26), victim's advocate for victim of domestic violence or sexual assault

 

Many communications which would otherwise be privileged are no longer privileged when the offense alleged is child abuse, sexual assault or domestic violence.

 

    8.  CRE 404              character evidence not admissible to prove conduct - exceptions - other crimes, wrongs, or acts

Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.

 

    9.  Impeach of a witness' credibility

 

Felony Convictions

 

Evidence of prior felony convictions is admissible to attack the credibility of a defendant who testifies on his own behalf. People v. Montez, 197 Colo. 126, 589 P.2d 1368 (1979), CRS 13-90-101

 

Misdemeanor Convictions

 

A defendant's credibility may not be impeached by evidence of prior misdemeanor convictions. People v. Robles, 183 Colo. 4, 514 P.2d 630 (1973).

 

While evidence of prior misconduct, including misdemeanor convictions, may be admitted to attack the veracity of specific testimony by a defendant, People v. Mejia, 188 Colo. 120, 534 P.2d 779 (1975), People v. Terranova, 38 Colo. App. 476, 563 P.2d 363 (1977), impeachment of a defendant "may not be accomplished by attacking the general character of the witness." People v. Taylor, 190 Colo. 210, 545 P.2d 703 (1976).

 

Evidence of prior misdemeanor convictions involving false statements to police held admissible for impeachment purposes where focus was on the specific instances of lying, not on the convictions themselves, and the jury was instructed to consider the evidence only for the limited purpose of evaluating the defendant's credibility. People v. Gillis, 883 P.2d 554 (Colo. App. 1994).

 

Where defense counsel specifically limited his questioning of the defendant and other character witnesses to a particular time, introduction of character testimony limited to his conduct during that particular time did not raise any inference of untrue testimony concerning defendant's activities during a previous time. People v. Sasson, 628 P.2d 120 (Colo. App. 1981), Lutz v. People, 133 Colo. 229, 293 P.2d 646 (1956).

 

Procedural requirements applicable to admission of evidence of similar transactions are not applicable where evidence is introduced to rebut the truth of defendant's direct testimony. People v. Moore, 693 P.2d 388 (Colo. App. 1984).

 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************
 

Due to the potential damaging and prejudicial effect of admitting evidence of prior bad acts or prior transactions, a plethora of law exists with respect to multiple types of criminal offenses.  The above is but a brief glimpse.

INDEPENDENT SERVICE PROVIDERS
private investigators * process service * laboratories * transcription
refer to attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine

ADVICE BY LAYMEN
forewarned is forearmed
advice by unsupervised paralegals & street corner lawyers

SELF HELP - LEGAL FORMS
 
 Links are provided immediately below - that's your gateway to self-help.  Please do not call or email inquiring how do I "do-it-yourself".
Please do not request attorney form & content review of documents you prepare for your litigation.  Attorney will politely but immediately decline such requests.
 

SEALING LEGAL FORMS

LEGAL FORMS - ON-LINE

LEGAL FORMS - HARDCOPY

 

MID-LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
sealing lawsuit commenced by a private person or by another attorney

 

Counsel declines mid-litigation cases.  It more difficult to amend pleadings and to amend or supplement notices than to commence the lawsuit properly.  Final orders hearing is frequently docketed 30 days from setting.  Time is a critical factor, and insufficient time may exist for error correction.  Attorney will not assume professional liability associated with a muck created by a private person or other counsel.  Please do not request mid-litigation representation - attorney will decline without apology.

 

Exception.  Attorney may consider if client agrees to dismiss the pending sealing lawsuit without prejudice and commence a new sealing lawsuit - "cooking from scratch".  Counsel would prepare a new sealing lawsuit within normal time parameters, but would not advance such a case on the attorney's calendar simply due to the client's immediacy needs caused by someone else's failure to properly commence the sealing lawsuit.  Dismissal and re-filing would cause delay of final orders hearing as well as duplicate expense - court filing fees, court e-File and Serve charges, mailing costs, reproduction copy costs, process service, etc.  Appearance and dismissal of the former lawsuit would increase attorney's fees on an hourly fee basis.  Counsel has done this before where the client's former attorney filed sealing pleadings in the wrong court.  If dismissal and re-filing is not acceptable, seek mid-litigation assistance elsewhere.

  FIND A LAWYER  

SEALING CRIMINAL RECORDS
DO I NEED AN ATTORNEY?

 

Do I need an attorney?

Sealing Colorado criminal records - probably time to loosen the pocket book and hire an attorney when sealing records.

 

Unless agreed in writing otherwise at the time of underlying criminal case disposition, it is the policy of the District Attorney's Office to oppose sealing of records in any criminal case.  As with all lawsuits, a person has a right to represent himself / herself.  However, If sealing criminal justice records is of sufficient importance that you are considering, it should be done properly.  Once final order has entered, the matter becomes res judicata - you only have one opportunity to litigate.  No "re-do's" if you commit error and receive an adverse ruling.  You may retain my services or the services of another attorney, but hire competent counsel.

RETAINER DATA INFO SHEET
.pdf file available to public
LAWSUIT DATA INFO SHEET
client .pdf file - restricted access

EMPLOYMENT LAW QUESTIONS

 

        Attorney is knowledgeable regarding sealing Colorado criminal justice records, however he does not practice employment law and therefore will offer no opinion regarding any employment matter.  This denial or consultation or advice includes but is not limited to:

lawful circumstances under which a background check may be made as a condition of continued employment or promotion,

pre-screening tool upon employment application,

availability to law enforcement or FBI in the course of a security clearance background check, or use thereof.

 

        Similarly attorney will not discuss legality of adverse action taken by any employer or prospective employer on the basis of information found in a background check.  Not being harsh here - attorney simply is not competent in the field of employment law.

 

        This notice is provided due to numerous calls from persons who are not eligible to seal and who want information regarding employment adverse action or inability to secure employment based upon prior criminal conviction.  Unless your former criminal case meets the minimum threshold to seal criteria, counsel can not provide assistance.

 

please seek answers to employment questions
from an attorney who practices in the field of employment law

FIND A LAWYER

Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
PROCURING COURT RECORDS

RECORDS SEARCH *  RECORDS RETRIEVAL

review of the court file is necessary for attorney to render an opinion
attorney can not and will not offer advice regarding sealing eligibility until review of the court file

  

A former defendant may contact the relevant Clerk of Court (statewide listing) to procure a copy of entire court file without assistance of counsel.  Court records in El Paso County are ordered via the below form submitted to the court by fax or by mail.  If you physically appear in the records center, deputy clerks may insist that you submit the form and leave - subsequent mailing of records to the person making the request.  If outside El Paso County, call the relevant court during normal business hours.  Minimum threshold - sealing eligibility criteria.

 

1.  Attorney will not procure court records on behalf of a prospective client.  This is the prospective client's responsibility.
2.  Please provide to counsel the following records from the Clerk of Court.
          a) register of action    b) all documents in the court file    c) all minute orders (if any)
          Note: El Paso County request form linked below has this verbiage pre-typed to avoid error by client or prospective client.
                   Fax numbers for the courts in El Paso County and Teller County are pre-printed on the form for your convenience ordering records.
     Copies in your possession (likely partial court file) are insufficient & will be declined.
     Please procure the court file if your seek an opinion regarding eligibility - no exceptions.

 

INFORMATION & LOCATIONS TO REQUEST STATE COURT RECORDS
if you physically appear to procure records, be prepared for metal detectors at the entrance of each courthouse

State Courts -  El Paso County -
State Courts -  El Paso County -
State Courts -     Teller County -
State Courts - Douglas County -
State Courts -   Pueblo County -
Colorado State Judicial Branch -

 Hardcopy Record Request Form -  fax, US Mail or hand deliver
 Search Fee Schedule and Data Dissemination Policy published by the Court
 
Hardcopy Record Request Form -  fax, US Mail or hand deliver
 
Clerk of Court - Douglas County - Douglas County Records Request Form
 Clerk of Court - Pueblo County
 Colorado Courts Records & Request Information

NOTE: El Paso & Teller
on-line record request sites remain unavailable 6/2011
Submit form via fax or mail
El Paso fax (719) 448-7695
Teller fax (719) 686-8000

District and County Courts in and for El Paso County
Open Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. - 4 p.m.  * *   State Court Records Center is located on the west end of the basement in the South Tower of the Judicial Complex
Colorado Springs Municipal Court Clerk
Open Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.  * *   Municipal Court Clerk's Office is located in Room 108 - first floor - east end of the Municipal Courthouse

 

Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY REVIEW OF CASE FOR SEALING

SEALING ELIGIBILITY REVIEW

procuring court records

minimum threshold to seal

prohibited cases not eligible

 

If provided the court file and the prospective client provides the court file and is interested in retaining, attorney is willing to review for sealing eligibility under the following conditions. 

a)  Prospective client is looking to retain counsel, not necessarily this attorney, but nevertheless seeking representation.
b)  Prospective client has reviewed, approves and is prepared to pay attorney fees and costs, as well as travel time, mileage and travel expenses if the case is outside El Paso County.
c)  If the above pre-conditions have not been met, attorney will decline phone consultation. 

 

1.  Attorney will not under any circumstance procure a court file for a prospective client unless counsel provided representation during the underlying criminal case.
                Procuring a court file is prospective client's responsibility.  If attorney represented in the underlying criminal case, counsel already has the file.
2.  With the court records, prospective client must provide his or her name, address, phone and contact email address
3.  Do not fax to counsel - faxes will be shredded without review.
4.  Do not mail to counsel - hardcopy documents received via US Mail will be shredded without review.
5. 
Email court file to:  courtfile@pcisys.net

a)  Separate email box has been established for the limited purpose of court file receipt.  Document submission is confidential * attorney-client privilege.
b)  In the subject line, place the word
courtrecords
                If the bypass phrase is not included in the subject line, all email in this box will be filtered - not received, not retrieved and not reviewed.
c)  Please call when email has been sent - attorney will not check this email box absent phone notice.
d)  Do not send .jpg images - .jpg documents are very poor quality.  Send .pdf or .tif files.  If you do not have scanning & conversion capability, take the hardcopy court file to FedEx-Kinko's, Office Max, Office Depot or another similar neighborhood store for conversion to an electronic file.  Adobe .pdf format is preferred.
e)  Do not send inquiries to this email box.  The box will not be checked absent a phone call.  Email would be unknown.
                Before sending an email inquiry, please refer to consultation policy.  Please send email to INQUIRIES

 

6.  ATTORNEY REVIEW OF COURT FILE - ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT.

                a.  Smaller Court Files - Less than 50 Pages  **  most court files (not all) fall in this category
                          1.  If the court file is not large and if provided by the prospective client, as part of the first consultation counsel would review smaller files (50 pages or less) for sealing eligibility without billing fees - no charge.
                          2.  Offer to review smaller court file at no charge is limited to cases within attorney's trade area in which the prospective client has indicated an interest in retaining if eligible to petition for sealing.  If outside attorney's trade area, refer to ¶ c below.

                b.  Larger Court Files - 50 Pages or More Hourly fees would be billed for review of larger files (50+ pages); prior deposit of $250 would be required; minimum one hour of attorney's time.  If additional time is apparent due to complexity of court case file, additional deposit would be required.

                c.  Cases Outside El Paso County If outside attorney's trade area, please contact local counsel for eligibility assessment and representation.  Attorney will consider court file review and case representation outside his trade area if prospective client is prepared to incur travel time, mileage and expense - one trip for final hearing would be anticipated.  Travel charts - pre-computed time & mileage expense.  Colorado is a big state for physical travel - counsel is located in Colorado Springs.  A map is included in this website for your convenience.  Counsel has filed sealing cases in numerous counties and is most willing to travel.

 

7.  SEALING DRUG CONVICTION CASES.  Attorney declines sealing drug conviction cases for non-clients.  Present or former clients please call attorney for details.

 

8.  ASSESSMENT regarding eligibility for sealing criminal justice records will be sent to you under the terms indicated above.
                Counsel sincerely hopes your case is eligible for sealing criminal justice records and welcomes the opportunity to become your attorney.

 

ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS
SEALING COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECORDS
Colorado Criminal Defense Trial Practice 30+ Years
retainer information sheet  **  lawsuit information sheet - restricted access
 
 
 
map * travel policy - time & expenses * travel rates click jitney for travel tables
outside El Paso County
one trip anticipated
for final orders hearing
 
Multiple Cases to Seal

 refer to link

Attorney fee options + litigation costs: flat fee through trial court final orders or hourly fees at client's discretion. Due to the fact sealing cases proceed to hearing on the merits regardless of prosecutor position, attorney offers hourly fees or a flat fee.  Settlement flat fee is not neither relevant nor offered.  Litigation costs are not included in fees - client's obligation.  Method of serving the final sealing order dramatically effects total client expenditure, particularly costs.  The above flat fee will be honored for sealing cases in El Paso County.  Method of final order service will be considered by attorney in a flat fee quote after consultation for sealing cases outside El Paso County.  Personal service of the final sealing order takes more time than e-Service of an electronic copy of the final order.  Hourly fees would reflect time expended if personal service is required.

 

hourly fees may be less than offered flat fees, however are not capped and more likely may exceed offered flat fees
hourly fee option election by client --- payment of flat fee + estimated costs total trust deposit required to retain
trust deposit overage - refunded at case conclusion   **   undercapitalization - immediate trust deposit required
CLIENT'S INITIAL ELECTION RE FLAT FEE OR HOURLY FEES SHALL BE BINDING AND FINAL

 

 

attorney does not accept installment payments  *  full payment is due at the time attorney is retained  *  major charge cards accepted

 

SEALING CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECORDS
 
Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES

LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT

 
 
 

$ 1,500  
$ 500  
 
common trust deposit request
District Court Hearing
including attorney's fees & litigation costs - excluding travel
additional cost deposit may be requested as trial preparation proceeds & anticipated litigation expenses solidify
  * estimate excludes sealing drug convictions
not applicable to cases outside El Paso County - phone quote required
 

* Multiple Cases to Seal
refer to link

 

$2,000*

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* this shall not constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate
Out of pocket litigation cost expenditures are the client's responsibility - trust deposit is required.

At the time of the first visit, a prospective client will be given a quote for fees and estimated costs. The quote will be honored for a period of seven (7) days, after which quotes are subject to change without notice if this office has not been retained.  Fee quote and costs trust deposit is dependent upon the facts and circumstances of each individual case.  Attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload.  Pending proposed client acceptance and payment, retainer agreement proposals are subject to withdrawal.  Attorney reserves the right to decline any case.  Refer to:  a) first consultation  b) attorney fees * costs * billings page  c) additional information.

Client authorization is obtained for any large cost expense.  Final expenditure may run less or client may periodically be asked for additional amounts to be deposited to trust if fees and costs will exceed previous deposits. 

Client will be provided with a trust accounting and itemized billing statement when there has been activity on the account.  At the end of each case, a detailed accounting summary is provided and remaining trust proceeds are refunded.

trust deposit for anticipated fees & costs is due when retained

attorney does not accept installment payments

regular billings are scheduled on the 1st and 15th
if fees and costs are not paid as agreed, representation is withdrawn

 
PARTIAL LIST OF POTENTIAL COSTS
out of pocket costs are the responsibility of the client
SEALING CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECORDS COSTS
sealing order - notice service of process
note: costs change & below cost information may be obsolete
link to Colorado Judicial Branch website -  current costs information published by state
COLORADO STATE COURT COSTS & FILING FEES
litigation costs fluctuate - not within attorney control
generic costs relevant to litigation generic costs relevant to criminal action
 
 

e-Service of Regular Copy Final Order Expenses
with 1 Reserve Certified Copy

Photocopy expense - final order by Clerk of Court $          7
Court certification - sealing court order 2 copies $        30
e-Search Colorado state courts & CBI database after sealing
   verification of records non accessibility
$        30
Subtotal if costs paid by check or cash $496
Charge card discount *
expense costs paid by charge card
$        21
 
Total estimated costs   (ballpark without travel)
Personal service of final sealing order dramatically affects costs
$517
 
Travel time and expenses ** Rates
 

- limited search pricing -

* Merchant discount (costs paid by charge card) may be avoided by payment of costs trust deposit by check or cash.  Attorney's fees may be paid by charge card with no merchant discount. 

Estimated Costs - Final Order Service via e-File & e-Serve
 
 
Client background search - price may may change - refer to link $     60
Search & retrieval fee & court file copies  - underlying criminal case $     25
Certification of deferred sentence agreement & dismissal order or
register of action - underlying criminal case - Municipal Court only
$     30
 
Court filing fee - sealing case $   156

Electronic File and Serve - sealing case - El Paso County
Notice: If agencies refuse to give an email address & fax e-Service is required: fax cost incurred of $8 per e-filing plus $0.50 per page per agency.  This may impact cases outside El Paso County.

$     80

 
 
Secretarial time - USPS queue certified mailing initial notice $     35
Photocopy expense - sealing case documents by attorney $     15
Office supplies $       5
Postage $     13
Data CD of attorney file for client at conclusion of case - optional $     10

** Travel is only applicable if the case is outside Colorado Springs
refer to
travel rates - one trip for final hearing would be anticipated

CAVEAT:  Additional expenses not identified may be incurred in any individual case; e.g. Fed-X overnight expense at request of client.  Costs quoted are subject to change by independent providers; actual costs paid by attorney will be billed.

Hopefully you are eligible to seal.
Thank you for considering my services; I appreciate your inquiry.
 
 
****************************** ****************************** ******************************
 
First Consultation Accounting Structure Hourly Fees Costs Flat Fee - Definition
Settlement Phase Contested Phase Settlement Flat Fee Trial Flat Fee
Flat Fees - Phases Earned Compare Hourly vs Flat Fees Client's Election Final Travel Time & Expenses
Security for Fees & Costs Trust Account Withdrawal or Termination Alternatives to Private Counsel
Client Duty to Disclose Omission or Non-Disclosure Attorney Selection Retaining Gustafson Advice by Laymen

please feel free to call or email if you are a client or are seeking representation

DISCLOSURES
Privacy
 
Notice & Disclaimer
 
Ethics & Client Disclosures
 applicable whether site visitor
reads or not

 
INITIAL CONSULTATION TERMS
not an offer for legal advice - refer to link
attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload
attorney reserves the right to decline any legal matter

PRIMARY WEBSITE

 

GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE TOPICAL WEBSITES

DUI DEFENSE - DWAI & DEAC DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE MIP - UNDERAGE ALCOHOL TRAFFIC TICKET DEFENSE DRIVING UNDER RESTRAINT SPEEDING TICKET DEFENSE
HIT AND RUN DEFENSE DRIVER LICENSE DEFENSE CRIMINAL DEFENSE PROSTITUTION DEFENSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DEFENSE
SEALING CRIMINAL RECORDS NUISANCE FORFEITURE DEFENSE SHOPLIFTING - THEFT DEFENSE
FAMILY LAW DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE COLORADO DIVORCE LEGAL SEPARATION STEP-PARENT ADOPTION GRANDPARENT ADOPTION
PATERNITY - LEGAL PARENTAGE CHILD SUPPORT SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT RESTRAINING ORDERS DEBT COLLECTION PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

 MAJOR SEARCH ENGINES

AltaVista AOL Search Ask Jeeves aka Teoma Bing - Microsoft Network Dogpile Excite Google
InfoSeek - Go Lycos Netscape Search WebCrawler Yahoo!
 

 Serving Colorado Springs Area Zip Codes

80918 80920 80919 80917 80915 80908 80132 80909 80913 80916 80921 80922 80925 80901 80902 80903 80904 80905 80906 80907 80910 80911 80912 80914 80921 80926 80928 80929 80930 80931 80933 80934 80935 80936 80937 80940 80941 80942 80943 80944 80945 80946 80947 80949 80950 80960 80962 80970 80977 80995 90997
 

sealing criminal records, Colorado Springs, Colorado, sealing, criminal, records, seal, criminal records, criminal justice records, records, offense, felony, misdemeanor, petty offense, records, court records, prosecution records, law enforcement records, police records, deferred sentence, guilty plea, court, lawyer, attorney, expungement, expunge

Website Copyright © 2003 - All Rights Reserved - Document Revised January 30, 2012
mountains photo image, attorney photo image & law office logo copyright © Robert D. Gustafson - all rights reserved - no copyright claimed to other images
Website Initial Publication Date: October 18, 2003 - Republication Date:
July 22, 2011

Hit Counter