GUSTAFSON
LAW
OFFICE
Colorado Springs, Colorado
El Paso County
Robert D. Gustafson
* Attorney at Law *
Colorado Springs |
|
| |
SEALING COLORADO CRIMINAL RECORDS |
 |
|
Phone (719) 260-1002
Fax (719) 260-1003 **
Toll Free (800) 410-1002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEALING COLORADO CRIMINAL
RECORDS
COLORADO SPRINGS
CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY
sealing court records - prosecution records - law enforcement or police
records |
|
|
Sealing Colorado Criminal
Justice Records - Colorado Equivalent to Expungement of Criminal Records
Sealing Criminal Records -
Colorado Springs Attorney - felony offenses * misdemeanor offenses *
petty offenses
Attorney Trial Practice 30+
years Colorado State Courts, Colorado Springs Municipal Court &
Colorado DMV License Hearings & Appeals |
|
first consultation terms
- please read terms -
representation inquiries invited & most welcome
under terms set forth below
questions from the public seeking free
advice or information are declined ** please be prepared to
retain and provide the criminal case court file for review |
| |
|
attorney does not accept
installment payments
* full payment
is due at the time attorney is retained * major charge cards
accepted |
|
|
|
|
lawsuit to seal criminal justice records can only be brought in the county
and state in which the underlying criminal charges were filed
you must go back to the original county for sealing relief
**
please do not call or email if your criminal case was not in
Colorado |
|
|
|
minimum threshold to seal
** prohibited
cases not eligible
** procuring the court file
**
attorney review ** attorney
fees and costs ** travel |
|
|
|
FIRST CONSULTATION
POLICY. Voluminous phone calls mandated
a restricted first consultation policy regarding sealing. |
 |
CONSULTATION - PRESENT OR FORMER CLIENTS. Please feel
free to call at any time regarding sealing of any criminal justice
record. |
|
CONSULTATION - NON-CLIENTS. Attorney will conduct a
phone
consultation
with a prospective new client only upon the following
terms. |
|
| |
|
1. Prospective
client has provided to counsel the records referenced in
procuring the court file.
Refer to terms of
attorney review.
2. Prospective client is looking to retain counsel, not
necessarily this attorney, but nevertheless seeking representation. |
|
3. Prospective
client has reviewed, approves and is prepared to pay attorney fees and
costs plus travel
time, mileage & travel expenses if case is outside El
Paso County. |
|
click jitney
for travel rates, mileage & costs
one trip anticipated for final orders hearing |
| |
|
This is simply a
no nonsense consultation policy regarding effective
no
nonsense representation. |
| |
above policy enables
attorney to validly
determine whether a sealing case has merit and whether attorney can
assist
attorney assessment
regarding eligibility for sealing criminal justice records will be emailed to
you under the linked terms
review of the entire criminal case court file is necessary to
determine whether the case is
eligible for sealing
or
not eligible |
|
|
|
|
|
common fees
are quoted on this page and information provided
attorney
is prepared to provide legal representation |
|
attorney
comparison is understandable, but before calling
please be prepared to
retain if I am counsel of your choice |
|
|
|
|
|
ATTORNEY POLICIES
Cases
Outside Colorado Springs - Travel
No
Pro Bono Assistance
*
No Installment Payment
Legal
Advice Limited to Clients - Not General Public
Representation
Now - Another Attorney or Self
Attorney
Representation & Declined Matters
No
Post Sentencing - Revocation or Appeal *
Sealing Records
|
attorney does not accept
criminal & traffic cases after sentencing unless he defended the underlying case
non-acceptance includes
probation revocation, deferred sentence revocation, parole violation or
appeal ** eligible
sealing
and
collateral attack
cases accepted |
| |

|
| |
|
If you are
reading this page, it is likely that at some point criminal charges were filed
against you or a law enforcement agency initiated a criminal investigation.
You are likely interested in sealing criminal records - Colorado Springs or
elsewhere in Colorado. Every criminal investigation or criminal prosecution leaves a
paper trail. The fact that no charges were filed, or if filed - that charges
were dismissed or not guilty verdict entered does not erase this paper trail.
If you are eligible to seal criminal justice agency records, several good
reasons for you to act as soon as possible. |
| |
|
If criminal
justice records are not
sealed: |
|
|
1. You, persons
with your written authorization, law enforcement agents, prosecutors,
courts, probation officers and parole officers have access to the
records, and likely the general public.
How difficult is it to
locate criminal records?
Colorado Criminal History
or
On-Line
Colorado Judiciary Records
or
El
Paso County - District & County Court Records
Call, write or drop by the local
court - request a name search - El Paso County Combined Courts
record request form
which may be submitted via fax
Not only is detailed
information available, quite likely the court file is accessible on
demand. |
| |
|
|
|
2.
If a subsequent criminal investigation of a similar nature arises, law
enforcement officers are more likely to arrest, and prosecutors are
more likely to charge plus less likely to dismiss or offer a favorable
plea agreement. Did it before, did it again. |
| |
|
|
|
3.
If subsequent charges are filed for an offense of a similar nature
arises, prosecutors may seek to introduce evidence of the current
investigation or criminal prosecution, even if charges were not filed
at this time or the current case was dismissed. They may argue
admissibility of the current matter under theories of common
plan-scheme-design, identity, modus operandi, motive, guilty
knowledge, intent, lack of mistake, accident, legal justification
(self defense, defense of property, lawful child discipline) or
impeachment of witness credibility. While the jury would be
instructed as to the limited purpose for the evidence, jurors may
think - Did it before, did it again.
Brief information is included regarding admissibility - refer to
admissibility
link.
If subsequent charges are
filed for an offense of a similar nature arises, prosecutors may seek to
introduce evidence of the current investigation or criminal prosecution at
the time of sentencing even if charges were not filed at this time or the
current case was dismissed. Prosecutors
may attempt use as an aggravating factor - requesting increase the
seriousness of penalties. |
|
| |
|
You may have
the right to file a separate civil lawsuit in District Court requesting that
criminal justice agency records be sealed. Sealing does not happen automatically.
Sealing criminal records Colorado
Springs - courts in El Paso County require a separate civil lawsuit to be filed for each
matter to be sealed. |
| |
|
lawsuit to seal criminal justice records can only be brought in the county
and state in which the underlying criminal charges were filed
you must go back to the original county for sealing relief
**
consult an attorney in the state of the underlying criminal case |

 |
MINIMUM
THRESHOLD REQUIRED TO SEAL |
|
|
please read before calling the attorney |
|
if the court imposed
sentence, the case is not eligible for sealing
calling an attorney will not
change that - call your Colorado legislator |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1. After investigation, the matter was dropped
without filing criminal charges.
|
|
OR
|
| |
|
2.
After prosecution was initiated, all charges in the criminal case were
dismissed. This includes but not limited to evidentiary suppression,
nolle, nolle prosequi, insufficient evidence, dismissal, straight
dismissal, flat dismissal, or successful completion of a
deferred
sentence and subsequent dismissal. |
|
AND
|
|
a. You did not waive your rights to petition to seal
in plea negotiation.
El Paso County DA Office
has a sealing waiver pre-printed into misdemeanor
deferred
sentence agreements. Many felony
deferred
sentence agreements are custom
drafted and contain a similar clause. If such a clause exists, the right to seal
is gone unless perhaps grounds exist for a
collateral attack. Place to begin -
carefully read your
deferred
sentence agreement looking for the word waive, waives,
waived and also
the numbers
CRS
24-72-308. |
|
AND
|
|
b. For dispositions involving investigation but non-filing or dismissal
as a result of a plea agreement in another case, the
uncharged offense investigation records or flat dismissal would be eligible for
sealing
10 years after the date of final disposition of all criminal proceedings if no
new criminal charges have been brought during the 10 years. CRS
42-72-308(1)(a)(III) - 2004 amendment permitted sealing and 2008
amendment reduced window from 15 years to 10 years. |
|
|
|
Note: DUI, DEAC & DWAI as well as driving under restraint are
classified as misdemeanors - criminal charges - as well as some other
traffic matters.
Counsel construes the traffic sealing exceptions to exclude traffic
related misdemeanors from sealing eligibility. Exercise care if relevant.
|
|
|
OR
|
| |
|
3. After prosecution was initiated, a judge or jury
entered a verdict of not guilty on all charges
|
|
|
|
NOTE
|
CASES NOT
ELIGIBLE FOR SEALING PURSUANT TO
COLORADO LAW |
|
To be eligible to seal, a case must fall within the above criteria |
|
If you entered a guilty plea or were found guilty
at trial
and
the court imposed sentence
on any charge, the criminal court case is not eligible to seal criminal
justice records. If you were sentenced to probation or received a
straight jail sentence on any charge in the case, no charge in the case is
eligible for sealing. If this exists, please don't call hoping you
will hear something different. It never hurts to obtain a second
opinion from a different attorney. |
|
Deferred sentence is another matter -
this type of disposition may be
eligible for sealing. If you
waived sealing rights
in the deferred sentence plea disposition, counsel will decline sealing
representation. Unfortunately, counsel finds this type of waiver
clause in most deferred sentence agreements, particularly in El Paso
County due to
DA Office
policy. Eligibility can only be determined by
review of the court file. |
|
Collateral attack
may be possible - refer to link
|
|
Drug conviction
- second chance law - refer to link |
|
If uncertain of final disposition and you think perhaps eligible,
procure the court file, submit the entire court file for
attorney review and
call. |
|
SEX OFFENDER. Conviction of an
offense for which the factual basis was unlawful sexual behavior as
defined in
CRS 16-22-102(9)
is not eligible for sealing. Refer to
CRS 24-72-308(3)(c).
This attorney interprets the statute to prohibit sealing of any amended
charge to which plea is entered, including records of the original sex
offender charge. Given that a petition to seal would be dismissed
by the Court prior to setting a hearing, this attorney would decline
representation in such circumstance. You may consult other
counsel. |
|
If the entire case was either not
filed, dismissed or not guilty verdict entered as to all counts, feel
free to submit your court file for
review. |
|
|
|
WAIVER OF RIGHTS TO SEAL CLAUSE - DEFERRED SENTENCE AGREEMENT |
| |
|
All deferred sentence plea agreements with the El Paso
County DA Office contain a standard clause that the defendant agrees "to
give up any future right I may have, whether provided by C.R.S.
24-72-308 or by any other law, to have those records sealed by court
order." This has been in the El Paso DA Office deferred sentence
agreements for decades and must be eliminated in plea negotiations, or
the deferred agreement will contain such a clause. Prosecutors in
other counties or jurisdictions may or may not have such a clause
"pre-canned" into their deferred sentence agreements or may insert for
any particular case.
In an appeal from a sealing case originating in El Paso County, the
deferred sentencing agreement contained the above standard clause in the
underlying criminal case. The criminal case was later dismissed in
compliance with the provisions of CRS 18-1.3-102(2) and the terms of the
stipulation. Defendant later filed a petition to seal criminal
justice records. The DA Office objected. The District Court
rejected the People's argument on the ground that the waiver provisions
of the plea agreement are "opposed to public policy" and granted the
petition. Appeal to the Court of Appeals followed and the
appellate court ruled as follows. People v. Ward-Garrison,
72 P.3d 423 (Colo. App. 2003) |
|
1. A trial court lacks authority
under these statutory provisions to act unilaterally to modify the
terms of such an agreement without the district attorney's consent.
People v. C.G., 12 P.3d 861 (Colo.App. 2000). No such
consent was given here. |
| |
|
2. Defendant's waiver of his future
right to challenge prior convictions made as part of plea agreement
did not violate public policy and was valid and enforceable in
subsequent proceedings. People v. Gurule, 748 P.2d 1329 (Colo.App.
1987) |
| |
|
3. The appellate court views the
1996 amendments as reflecting a broad public policy against the
sealing of criminal records in situations involving a favorable
disposition to the defendant under a plea agreement, especially when,
as here, the defendant has admitted committing a crime, received the
benefit of the bargain, and offered no suggestion that the express
waiver was otherwise invalid. |
| |
|
4. Public policy favors the
enforcement of defendant's express waiver of her statutory right to
request the sealing of the criminal record in this case. |
| |
|
5. The waiver of rights to seal
clause was upheld and the case was remanded to the District Court for
denial of the petition to seal criminal justice records. |
|
|
|
|
The Teller County DA Office is staffed by the El Paso
County DA Office - 4th Judicial District. Deferred sentence
agreements follow the same pattern as indicated above.
Shortly after Ward-Garrison, supra, an appeal was taken
from a sealing case in Teller County; the deferred sentencing agreement
in the underlying criminal case contained the above standard clause.
As above, the criminal case was later dismissed in compliance with the
provisions of CRS 18-1.3-102(2) and the terms of the stipulation.
Defendant later filed a petition to seal criminal justice records.
At hearing on the petition to seal, Petitioner argued that CRS 16-7-303
and CRE 410, which prohibits the admission of plea negotiations in civil
actions, barred the district court from considering the waiver.
Petitioner also argued that the waiver provision was a contract of
adhesion and therefore unenforceable. The DA Office objected.
The District Court rejected the Petitioner’s claims under CRS 16-7-303
and CRE 410. The appellate court ruled as follows.
Walker-Lawrence v. District Court in and for Teller County, 74 P.3d
521 (Colo. App. 2003) |
|
1. Public policy favors the
enforcement of a defendant's express waiver of her statutory right to
request the sealing of criminal records, where the defendant received
a favorable disposition and the benefit of the bargain under a plea
agreement. The Ward-Garrison division concluded that CRS
18-1.3-102(2), which provides that a defendant who enters into a
deferred sentencing agreement "is obligated to adhere to such
stipulation," requires that the terms of such stipulations be
enforced. The division noted that a trial court lacks authority
under these statutory provisions to act unilaterally to modify the
terms of such an agreement without the district attorney's consent.
No such consent was given here. |
| |
|
2. The Court of Appeals rejected
petitioner's evidentiary arguments that the terms of the plea
agreement are not admissible in this proceeding to seal the record.
CRE 410 prohibits the admission of evidence of a guilty plea later
withdrawn or statements made by a defendant during plea negotiations
in subsequent proceedings against the defendant. Likewise, CRS
16-7-303 makes statements made in the course of plea negotiations
inadmissible against or in favor of the defendant in subsequent
proceedings. |
| |
|
3. These provisions do not bar
discovery of the terms of the deferred sentence and judgment.
Because CRS 18-1.3-102(2) clearly provides that a defendant who enters
into a deferred sentencing agreement is obligated to adhere to such
stipulation, the trial court must be permitted to review the terms of
the agreement to determine whether the defendant is in compliance with
those terms. Nor is the sentencing agreement being used in a
proceeding against petitioner. Thus, CRE 410 and CRS 16-7-303
are inapplicable. Petitioner's contention that these provisions
somehow modify a contract which has already been performed is not
supported by established precedent. |
| |
|
4. Moreover, because Petitioner has
received the benefit of the bargain she made, we perceive no basis in
public policy to now allow her to renege on that portion of the
agreement expressly waiving the right to request the sealing of the
record. See People v. Ward-Garrison, supra. |
|
| |
|
Attorney has set forth these cases to emphasize that counsel will
decline a sealing case wherein the deferred sentencing agreement in the
underlying criminal case contains a waiver by defendant of his or rights to seal
criminal justice records. It is counsel's opinion that such a sealing case
would be summarily dismissed. Important as sealing may be to a person with
concurrent motivation to pay attorney's fees, counsel simply will not accept a
client's money with knowledge that dismissal is foreseeable and that the merits
of the case will never be reached.
Counsel has repeatedly heard from prospective clients that he or she did not
understand the meaning of the clause or was unaware of it's existence in the
deferred sentencing agreement which he or she signed. Invariably the 6
month statute of limitations upon
collateral attack has more than lapsed by the time the person
considers sealing criminal justice records. The only means by which
counsel can envision a sealing waiver passing the statutory eligibility
threshold is for the criminal defendant / sealing petitioner to obtain from the
DA Office prior consent to rescission of his or her waiver and prior consent to
sealing. Counsel considers that possibility to be virtually non-existent
and declines such cases. |
|
|
|

|
SECOND CHANCE LAW |
|
LIMITED TO
PRIOR DRUG CONVICTIONS |
|
|
|
| |
|
Sealing drug conviction lawsuits are significantly more
complex than a regular sealing case. Fingerprint
background check must be procured, lawsuit preparation is
required for DA Office consent, likely a new fingerprint
background check due to time expiration, then filing with
the court and hearing. This is a costly process;
more so than standard sealing cases.
Attorney hourly fees. Attorney flat
fee: $2,500 ** costs estimated: $2,000
** total trust deposit to retain: $4,500. If
elected, hourly fees may likely exceed the attorney flat fee. |
| |
|
CONSULTATION / REPRESENTATION
POLICY. Due to effort
required and costs, counsel has limited consultation and representation to
existing or former
clients regarding drug conviction sealing cases. |
| |
|
Present clients or former clients.
Please feel free to call or email. |
|
|
|
Persons who are not
current or former clients.
Attorney does not offer consultation or representation
to persons who are not
current or former clients. Please do not
call or email - consultation will be immediately declined
without further discussion. |
| |
|
|
* *
* * *
* * *
* |
|
|
|
SECOND CHANCE LAW |
Sealing
eligibility for sealing drug convictions commences with
convictions on or after July 1, 2008. Convictions
prior to that date are not eligible. The statutes
are quite restrictive.
Non-drug related convictions
- this does not apply and is not relief.
Perhaps the Colorado Legislature will subsequently
consider a second chance law for other types of
convictions, but - not yet - not today. |
|
2008 LAW
amended 2011 |
CRS 24-72-308.5
CRS 24-72-308.6 |

FILING - NOTICE
e-Filing
availability and court mandatory requirements
|
|
| |
|
MULTIPLE CASES - Separate Sealing Lawsuit Filing Per Criminal Case to be Sealed
The court requires a
separate sealing lawsuit to be filed per criminal case to be sealed,
even if all cases occurred in one county. This court policy is
inflexible. Several years ago attorney filed one civil sealing
lawsuit to seal three criminal cases within El Paso County. The
filing was rejected by the Clerk of Court and separate sealing lawsuits
were subsequently filed for each criminal case. To save the client
money, this attorney filed with the Court, and folks - that bird won't
fly. |
| |
Multiple Cases to Seal -
Practical Application of Court Policy |
| |
|
1. A separate sealing lawsuit must be prepared by counsel for
each criminal case to be sealed. Counsel has no control over
Colorado judiciary policy. |
|
2. A statutory filing fee is charged by the Clerk of Court to
file civil lawsuit. For each sealing suit filed, the court
filing fee doubles, triples, etc. Same applies to court e-Filing
and e-Service expenses, court copy expenses and court certification. |
|
3. U.S. Mail certified mailing costs double, triple, etc. for
the initial notice of filing and hearing. |
|
4. If a criminal justice agency must be e-Served via fax, costs
double, triple, etc. Similarly if a criminal justice agency must
be personally served with a certified copy of the final sealing order,
then court copy costs, court certification costs and process server
costs double, triple, etc. |
|
5. Contrary to what one might think, it's easier to prepare two
sealing lawsuits for two different clients than to prepare two
sealing lawsuits for the same client.
Attorney fees double, triple, etc. with multiple
sealing lawsuit filings. No "twofer freebies" - the
work is there - so are the
attorney fees & costs. |
if unacceptable,
don't call this attorney to wrangle a deal - seek no billing legal
services
elsewhere
every conceivable manipulation to lower fees & costs has been
tried through the years by prospective clients - it simply doesn't
work |
|
|
6. If you were a naughty boy or girl and have multiple criminal cases
to seal, the fiddler's bill is now coming due for the dancing done in
bygone days. |
|
|
| |
|
Initial Court Review: Denial Without Hearing
Upon the filing of a petition, the
court shall review the petition and determine whether there are grounds
under this section to proceed to a hearing on the petition. If the
court determines that the petition on its face is insufficient or if the
court determines that, after taking judicial notice of matters outside
the petition, the petitioner is not entitled to relief under this
section, the court shall enter an order denying the petition and mail a
copy of the order to the petitioner. The court's order shall
specify the reasons for the denial of the petition
CRS
24-72-308(1)(b)(II)(A) |
| |
|
Initial Court Review:
Hearing To Be Set
At the time of filing of a petition, if the court does not determine that
grounds exist on the face of the petition at that time for the court to deny the
request to seal, the court is required to set a date for a hearing.
CRS 24-72-308(1)(b)(II)(A) |
| |
|
Initial Notice to Agencies with Records to Seal
If the
court determines that the petition is sufficient on its face and that no other
grounds exist at that time for the court to deny the petition under this
section, the court shall set a date for a hearing and the petitioner shall
notify the prosecuting attorney by certified mail, the arresting agency, and any
other person or agency identified by the petitioner.
CRS 24-72-308(1)(b)(II)(B) |
| |
|
The statutory language is ambiguous. Does the statute require service by certified mail upon all
agencies or just the prosecuting attorney? It makes a great deal of
difference in postage expense and time expended preparing certified mail. Courts in
El Paso County have interpreted the statute to require notice by
certified mail only upon prosecutors, and notice to the remaining agencies with
records to seal may be given via
e-Service or regular U.S. Mail, postage
pre-paid, evidenced by a certificate of mailing. Courts in other counties may differ and
require notice to all agencies by certified mail. |

|
FINAL ORDERS HEARING
TIMING - CRITERIA -
COURT ORDER
|
|
|
APPROXIMATE TIMING
|
|
Attorney has published
documents which facilitate preparation of a retainer agreement and the
lawsuit. |
|
1. Link to
retainer agreement data information sheet. Document is not
password protected. The completed form may be faxed to the
attorney for preparation of a proposed fee agreement. Retainer
agreement will be emailed to prospective client within 1-2 business days;
generally the evening of receipt. |
|
2. Link to
sealing lawsuit information sheet. Document is password
protected. Password is provided to a client to expedite
preparation of the petition to seal criminal justice records.
Client may drop off, mail, fax or email the completed information form
to counsel. |
|
3. From the time counsel has received the executed fee agreement,
trust deposit payment and the completed lawsuit information sheet,
within a week to 10 business days attorney will prepare the petition
to seal criminal justice records and forward to the client in .pdf
format (Adobe Reader ver. 5 or above). |
 |
|
4. When client has executed the petition to seal, the original
document can be returned to counsel via FedEx overnight. e-Filing
with the court generally occurs within 1 business day from receipt;
frequently the evening of receipt.
Client's geographic distance need not pose a problem in lawsuit
preparation or e-Filing. |
|
5. e-Filing acceptance commonly occurs within 1-3 business days
from electronic submission; sometimes the same day. At that time,
a case number is available and the Court division has been assigned.
It is then possible to call the division clerk for a hearing date.
Final orders hearing is frequently set approximately 30 days from the
date of setting with the division clerk. |
|
6. The court now e-Serves the final sealing order upon counsel;
frequently within 1-3 business days
from hearing date and sometimes the same day. Counsel will then
e-file and can e-Serve a notice and certificate of service. If
e-Served, immediately up e-Filing the agencies receive immediate notice
and an electronic file of the sealing order. Actual sealing of the
records by the agencies depends upon how backlogged the agencies'
records custodians may be. |
|
7. From the time client requests representation, it would not be
uncommon to have a final order within approximately 6 weeks & actual
sealing within 2+ months. |
|
|
|
|
CRITERIA - SEALING
COURT ORDER |
|
|
|
In
making a determination, the trial court should consider the severity of the
offense sought to be sealed, the time which has elapsed since the conviction,
the subsequent criminal history of the petitioner, and the need for the
government agency to retain the records. D.W.M. v. District Court, 751
P.2d 74 (Colo. 1988); People v. Bushu, 876 P.2d 106 (Colo. App. 1994). The court may also consider factors relating to the strength of the case,
petitioner's age and employment history, and various consequences if the records
are not sealed. The balance test allows for consideration of other factors on a
case-by-case basis. Bushu, supra. |
|
|
|
If after the
hearing is conducted the court finds that the harm to the privacy of the
petitioner or dangers of unwarranted adverse consequences to the petitioner
outweigh the public interest in retaining the records, the court may order such
records to be sealed. By law, basic identification information will not be
sealed.
CRS
24-72-308(1)(c) |
|
The statute
indicates the general assembly's intent to preserve the complete criminal
justice record, but in a form that protects the individual named from any
harmful effects. Physical destruction of records not generally allowed. By
fashioning the remedy of sealing records, the general assembly did not intend
that the physical destruction of the records also be allowed in most
situations. People v. Wright, 43 Colo. App. 30, 598 P.2d 157 (1979). |
|
|
|
|
Counsel prepares and e-Files an affidavit of the petitioner setting forth
with specificity the privacy interest harm suffered. This gives notice
to the Court and to the DA Office of harm prior to the judge taking the
bench at hearing on the merits. Exhibits may be attached to the affidavit, such as employment
rejection letters and the like. Background check documents (Colorado
state courts litigation history, CBI history, national criminal records
search and if PIN is available, Colorado driving record) are available in
hardcopy at hearing for introduction into evidence if relevant or needed. |

|
|
SEALING
ORDER - NOTICE |
|
method of
serving the final sealing order has significant impact upon cost and upon
probability of compliance - actual sealing
agency records request forms
- access limited to clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. A copy of the order is to be
provided to the custodian of record of each agency named in the petition
CRS 24-72-308(1)(b)(II). The Clerk of Court in the sealing
civil case receives notice via the sealing order itself. If records of
a different court are being sealed, notice would have to be given to the
other Court Clerk. e.g. municipal court |
| |
|
2.
Records Custodian Failure to Seal - Misdemeanor.
Any person who willfully and knowingly fails to seal is guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not
more than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not
more than ninety days, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
CRS 24-72-309 |
|
|
|
3. Multiple options are exist regarding notice and service of the sealing order
upon the agencies with criminal justice records.
Usually 8 - 14 agencies are named in a petition to
seal. Now we must also contend with additional
information database
re-sellers. |
| |
|
METHOD OF SERVING SEALING ORDER AND FORM OF SEALING ORDER |
| |
|
Service of the final sealing order may be made upon the criminal justice
agencies by: 1)
e-File and Serve. 2) personal
service of process by a process server. 3) U.S. Mail - certified
mail. 4) U.S. Mail - regular mail. |
| |
|
Options re form of final sealing order to be served: 1) electronic copy
containing court filing stamp & judge's approval 2) certified copy
3) regular photocopy |
|
|
Electronic copy of the final sealing order
- received by counsel from the court via email - no cost. |
|
e-Service via email is less costly than fax e-Service. |
|
Certified copies & process service.
Certified copies from the court are $0.75 per page copy cost plus $20
per certification (two copies per agency if personally served).
Additionally, fees & costs to a process server may run $55 - $100 per
agency served. If personal service of final orders certified by
the court was required upon all agencies, $1,200+ could be added to
costs estimated herein. |
|
Attorney makes every
effort to utilize e-Service and avoid personal service wherever
possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
Attorney will not serve the final order via USPS certified mail or
regular mail. Such service leaves the door open for too many variables
which may result in one or more criminal justice agencies not sealing the
records. |
|
|
|
If accepted by a criminal justice agency, attorney will serve an electronic copy
of the final order via
e-File and Serve. In El Paso
County, all agencies will accept e-Service. Only the probation department
in El Paso County requires e-Service via fax; the remainder accept via email.
CBI accepts e-Service via email. FBI NCIC obtains records
from each state agency (here CBI) and therefore the sealing order is not served
upon FBI NCIC. |
| |
|
Options where any criminal justice agency declines to accept accepted service of
an electronic copy of the final order by
e-File and Serve. |
| |
|
If
counsel can ascertain the criminal justice
agency records department fax number, e-Service via fax will be will
utilized regardless of agency consent. |
|
Counsel has yet to to encounter the problem, but if an agency refused
to seal upon receipt of an electronic copy of the final sealing order
via fax and demanded a certified copy, counsel would move for court
ruling on such issue. Service via the court appointed agent
e-File and Serve of an electronic
order containing the court seal should
constitute validation. |
|
|
|
On occasion, the records department of a criminal
justice agency adamantly refuses to provide an email address or fax number. If counsel can not ascertain a
records department fax, attorney will cause a
certified copy of the sealing order to be personally upon the criminal
justice agency by a professional process server. This
significantly increases
cost. Usually records
custodians are quite pleasant and cooperative, however some can be "stinky
stinkers" to quote Bloody Mary from
South
Pacific. Easy or difficult, final order process
will be accomplished. |
|
|
| |
|
e-Service via email is utilized if available to avoid e-Service fax costs.
Personal service of a certified copy of the final sealing order is utilized only
as a last resort. When sealing outside El Paso County, it is a agency by
agency basis regarding method of service. Counsel will attempt to save
cost wherever possible. |
|
|
|
4. Sealing
Confirmation. Based upon easy
internet accessibility, at the time of closing file counsel conducts an on-line check of
Colorado State Courts litigation history and CBI history to ascertain
records are sealed and unavailable. Counsel advises each client to
attempt to procure records from each other agency 30 days after entry of
the sealing order to verify that records are in fact not accessible.
Please refer to the below links for information regarding searching the
FBI "rap sheet" and client records requests to law enforcement agencies. |
|
|
| |
|

2011
STATUTORY AMENDMENT
Information Database
Re-Sellers
|
|
| |
|
The
statutory amendment enacted in 2011 merely provides for electronic
notification of the sealing order and service of the final sealing order
upon private custodians (information database re-sellers) of criminal
justice agency records or Colorado Judiciary records. People in all
states joke about the wisdom of their state legislature, and laws are
frequently enacted restricting civil liberties or favorable to government
while adverse to citizenry. The Colorado Legislature did something
good here. Sealing wouldn't be accomplished if information re-sellers
continue to retain and sell data referencing sealed records subsequent to
sealing order. |
|
From counsel's
perspective, there was one major glitch with the 2011 amendment.
The citizen - sealing lawsuit petitioner is burdened with giving
notice and a copy of the sealing order to private custodians of
criminal justice records (information resellers). Who are
they??? - the internet is a big place. Colorado Judiciary, CBI,
Colorado Department of Revenue, etc. have let contacts with private
database companies and know the identity and contact information for
such vendors. It would have made sense to place the burden upon
the criminal justice agencies to notify their information
dissemination vendors of the sealing order, but our legislature chose
to place the burden upon the petitioner. Makes life a little
more difficult, now doesn't it? |
|

|
|
| |
|
Upon the entry of an order to seal
the records, the petitioner and all criminal justice agencies may properly
reply, upon any inquiry in the matter, that no such records exist with respect
to such person. An individual may deny his past criminal record.
CRS
24-72-308 clearly allows an individual to deny past criminal involvement if the criminal
record has been sealed pursuant to the statute. D.W.M., supra, Bushu,
supra. |
| |
|
POTENTIAL IMPORTANCE TO A PERSON'S FUTURE
|
|
|
|
Employers,
educational institutions, state and local government agencies, officials, and
employees may not, in any application or interview or in any other way,
require an applicant to disclose any information contained in sealed records.
An applicant need not, in answer to any question concerning arrest and
criminal records information that has been sealed, include a reference to or
information concerning such sealed information and may state that no such
action has ever occurred. Such an application may not be denied solely because
of the applicant's refusal to disclose arrest and criminal records information
that has been sealed.
CRS
24-72-308(1)(f)(I)
|
|

|
|
| |
|
By law, basic
identification information will not be sealed.
CRS
24-72-308(1)(c) |
|
"Basic identification information"
is limited to the name, place and date of birth, last-known address,
social security number, occupation and address of employment, physical
description, photograph, handwritten signature, sex, fingerprints, and
any known aliases of any person.
CRS
24-72-302(2).
|
|
|
|
Exception to sealing re
law enforcement agency inquiry. |
|
This section shall not apply to
arrest and criminal justice information or criminal justice records in
the possession and custody of a criminal justice agency when inquiry
concerning the arrest and criminal justice information or criminal
justice records is made by another criminal justice agency.
CRS
24-72-308(3)(d) |
|
Put another way, if a person is
subsequently investigated for another crime, law enforcement officers
will be able to view records of the sealed matter. Use by
prosecutors would only be permitted if prosecutors petitioned to
unseal records & the petition was granted by the court.
CRS
24-72-308(1)(e) |
|
|
| |
|
Records which are exempt from the statute and may not
be sealed.
CRS
24-72-308(3)
1. Any class 1 or class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense
2. Any class A or class B traffic infraction; or
3. DUI, DEAC or DWAI
4. Conviction records for unlawful sexual behavior
as defined in CRS
18-3-412.5(1)
- registered sex offenders
5. All records when inquiry is made by another criminal
justice agency
|
|
Additionally, the DMV is required to keep a separate file of
all abstracts of court records regarding dismissals and lesser alcohol
offense or non-alcohol offense convictions where the original charges
were alcohol or drug related traffic charges, i.e.: DUI, DEAC or DWAI. CRS
42-2-121(2)(b) These separate records are available only to
criminal justice agencies.
|
|
| |
|
Exception to the exception - DUI - DEAC -
DWAI charge - minor under age 21 and BAC below 0.05
42-4-1715. Convictions, judgments, and charges recorded - public inspection.
(1)(a) Every judge of a court not of record and every clerk of a court of record shall keep a full record of every case in which a person is charged with any violation of this article or any other law regulating the operation of vehicles on highways.
(b)
(I) Upon application by a person, the court shall expunge all records concerning a conviction of the person for driving any vehicle in this state with an alcohol level of at least 0.02 but not more than 0.05 grams of alcohol per hundred milliliters of blood or at least 0.02 but not more than 0.05 grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of breath while under twenty-one years of age pursuant to section 42-4-1301 (2) (a.5) if:
(A) Such person presents a request for expungement to the court and provides all information required by the court to process such request;
(B) Such person is over twenty-one years of age and the court action regarding the offense has been concluded;
(C) The person has not been convicted for any other offense under section 42-4-1301 that was committed while such person was under twenty-one years of age; and
(D) Such person pays the fine and surcharge for such conviction and completes any other requirements of the court with regard to such conviction, including, but not limited to, any order to pay restitution to any party.
(II) Upon receiving a request for expungement, the court may delay consideration of such request until sufficient time has elapsed to ensure that the person is not convicted for any additional offense under section 42-4-1301 committed while the person was under twenty-one years of age.
(2) Within ten days after the entry of a judgment, conviction, or forfeiture of bail of a person upon a charge of violating any provision of this article or other law regulating the operation of vehicles on highways, the judge or clerk of the court in which the entry of a judgment was made or the conviction was had or bail was forfeited shall prepare and immediately forward to the department an abstract of the record of said court covering every case in which said person had a judgment entered against him or her, was so convicted, or forfeited bail, which abstract must be certified by the person so required to prepare the same to be true and correct.
(3) Said abstract must be made upon a form furnished by the department and shall include the name, address, and driver's license number of the party charged, the registration number of the vehicle involved, the nature of the offense, the date of hearing, the plea, the judgment or whether bail forfeited, and the amount of the fine or forfeiture.
(4)(a) Every court of record shall also forward a like report to the department:
(I) Upon the conviction of any person of vehicular homicide or any other felony in the commission of which a vehicle was used; and
(II) Upon the dismissal of a charge for a violation of section 42-4-1301 (1) or (2) or if the original charge was for a violation of section 42-4-1301 (1) or (2) and the conviction was for a non-alcohol- or non-drug-related traffic offense.
(b) Every juvenile court shall forward a like report to the department upon the adjudication of delinquency of any juvenile based upon conduct which would establish vehicular homicide if committed by an adult.
(5) The department shall keep all abstracts received under this section, as well as a record of penalty assessments received, at the main office, and the same shall be public records and subject to the provisions of section 42-1-206.
|

Prosecutors may subsequently petition the court to
unseal the records. Inspection of the records included in an order sealing
criminal records may thereafter be permitted by the court only upon petition by
the person who is the subject of such records or by the prosecuting attorney and
only for those purposes named in such petition.
CRS
24-72-308(1)(e)

FAILURE TO SEAL
WHILE STATUTE PERMITS
|
In a case
where:
1. The sealing statute was amended
- restricting rights
to seal, and
2. Petitioner's records could have sealed records
under the former statute
3. Under the amended statute, Petitioner did
not meet the criteria to seal records
4. Petitioner failed to request sealing until
after amendment
5. Petitioner did not qualify for sealing under
the new statute - request denied
The court
ruled the opportunity to petition and to have the balancing test applied in a
hearing under this section is not a vested or a substantive right, application
of the amended statute to the petitioner did not violate the constitutional
prohibition against retrospective legislation (law not ex post facto), and the
petition was denied under the new statute. People v. D.K.B., 843 P.2d
1326 (Colo. 1993); E.J.R. v. District Court, County of Boulder, 892
P.2d 222 (Colo. 1995).
The sealing
statute has been amended multiple times, each becoming more restrictive and
limiting the circumstances under which criminal justice agency records can be sealed.
The above cases demonstrate - seal now while you can. If the law is changed
later and you haven't sealed - tough luck - should have acted sooner.
Applicable Maxim:
Recommendation: |
If you snooze, you lose.
If the remedy is available, file the petition to seal criminal justice records now.
|

If you enter
into a deferred sentence
agreement, sentencing is delayed for the period of time
agreed. Upon your satisfactory completion of all conditions of the
deferred
sentence, your plea of guilt will be withdrawn and the
deferred
charge(s) will
be dismissed.
1.
All Charges
Deferred and/or Dismissed.
a. If you entered a plea of guilt or nolo
contendere -
no contest (deferred) to the only charge or all charges, the entire case
will be dismissed. This will be done automatically by the Court without
further action on your part so long as you satisfactorily comply with
conditions set forth in your
deferred
sentence agreement. You may be able
seal records of the criminal case.
b. Review your
deferred
sentence agreement. Paragraph
no. 7 of the
deferred
sentence form pre-printed by the El Paso County
District Attorney’s Office contains the following clause:
As a part of this stipulation, the Defendant agrees
to give up any future right he / she may have, whether provided by
CRS
24-72-308 or by any other law, to have the record of this
deferred
judgment to be sealed by Court order.
I. If your
deferred
sentence agreement
contains no such waiver clause or the clause was stricken from the
agreement, you may petition to seal criminal justice records.
II. If your
deferred
sentence agreement
does contains such clause, at the time of the plea agreement you waived your
rights to seal, and you are prohibited from petitioning to seal criminal justice
records. The fact you failed to carefully read the agreement will not
likely be sufficient to set the plea aside, and if 6 months has elapsed you
are likely barred by a statute of limitations from bringing a
collateral attack
on the plea.
2.
Plea to
Deferred + Straight Plea of Guilt. If you entered
a plea of guilt or nolo contendere - no contest (deferred) to any charge(s)
and also entered a straight plea of guilt to any charge(s), by statute you are not
eligible to seal records of the case or any charges therein.
Conviction on the straight plea precludes you from sealing.
3.
Exceptions. If your case falls into one the
exceptions
noted above, you may not petition to seal records.

|
|
EVIDENCE
OF PRIOR BAD ACTS
SIMILAR TRANSACTIONS
POTENTIAL USES OF UNSEALED RECORDS |
|
|
|
| |
|
1.
CRS
24-72-305.3 Charitable organization volunteers or
employees - including volunteer's at your child's or grandchild's school or
organized social activities |
| |
|
2.
CRS
24-72-305.4 Governmental access - licensing -
applicants or licensees - regulated professions or occupations -
professional licensing |
| |
|
3. CRS
16-10-301 Evidence of
similar transactions - sexual offenses |
| |
|
4. CRS
18-6-810.5 Evidence of similar
transactions - domestic violence |
| |
|
5. CRS
13-90-101 Who may testify
- interest |
|
|
| |
|
6. CRS
13-90-106 Testimony -
exceptions |
|
Persons of unsound mind |
| |
|
Children under age 10 - testimony permitted in child abuse,
sexual abuse, sexual assault & incest allegations |
|
| |
|
7. CRS
13-90-107 Privileged
communications |
|
Husband-wife, physician, surgeon,
registered professional nurse, psychologist, clergyman, minister,
priest, rabbi, certified public accountant, CRS
19-1-103(26), victim's advocate
for victim of domestic violence or sexual assault |
| |
|
Many communications which would otherwise
be privileged are no longer privileged when the offense alleged is child
abuse, sexual assault or domestic violence. |
|
| |
|
8. CRE
404 character evidence not admissible to
prove conduct - exceptions - other crimes, wrongs, or acts |
|
Evidence of other
crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a
person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may,
however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive,
opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or
absence of mistake or accident.
|
|
| |
|
9. Impeach of a witness' credibility |
| |
|
Felony Convictions |
| |
|
Evidence of prior
felony convictions is admissible to attack the credibility of a
defendant who testifies on his own behalf. People v. Montez, 197 Colo. 126, 589 P.2d
1368 (1979), CRS
13-90-101 |
| |
|
Misdemeanor Convictions |
| |
|
A defendant's
credibility may not be impeached by evidence of prior misdemeanor
convictions. People v.
Robles, 183 Colo. 4, 514 P.2d 630 (1973). |
| |
|
While evidence of prior
misconduct, including misdemeanor convictions, may be admitted to
attack the veracity of specific testimony by a defendant, People v. Mejia,
188 Colo. 120, 534 P.2d 779 (1975), People v. Terranova, 38
Colo. App. 476, 563 P.2d 363 (1977), impeachment of a defendant
"may not be accomplished by attacking the general character of
the witness." People v. Taylor, 190 Colo. 210, 545 P.2d
703 (1976). |
| |
|
Evidence of prior
misdemeanor convictions involving false statements to police held
admissible for impeachment purposes where focus was on the specific
instances of lying, not on the convictions themselves, and the jury
was instructed to consider the evidence only for the limited purpose
of evaluating the defendant's credibility. People v. Gillis, 883
P.2d 554 (Colo. App. 1994). |
| |
|
Where defense counsel
specifically limited his questioning of the defendant and other
character witnesses to a particular time, introduction of character
testimony limited to his conduct during that particular time did not
raise any inference of untrue testimony concerning defendant's
activities during a previous time. People v. Sasson, 628 P.2d 120 (Colo.
App. 1981), Lutz v. People, 133 Colo. 229, 293 P.2d 646
(1956). |
| |
|
Procedural requirements
applicable to admission of evidence of similar transactions are not
applicable where evidence is introduced to rebut the truth of
defendant's direct testimony. People v. Moore, 693 P.2d 388 (Colo. App.
1984).
|
|
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
|
| |
|
Due to the potential damaging and prejudicial
effect of admitting evidence of prior bad acts or prior transactions, a plethora
of law exists with respect to multiple types of criminal offenses. The
above is but a brief glimpse.
|

|
INDEPENDENT SERVICE PROVIDERS
private investigators * process service
* laboratories * transcription
refer to attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine |
ADVICE
BY LAYMEN
forewarned is forearmed
advice by unsupervised paralegals
& street corner lawyers |
 |
|

|
SELF HELP - LEGAL
FORMS |
| |
Links
are provided immediately below - that's your gateway to self-help.
Please do not call or email inquiring how do I
"do-it-yourself".
Please do not request attorney form & content review of documents
you prepare for your litigation. Attorney will politely but
immediately decline such requests. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
MID-LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
sealing lawsuit commenced by a private person or by another
attorney |
| |
|
Counsel declines mid-litigation cases. It more difficult to
amend pleadings and to amend or supplement notices than to
commence the lawsuit properly. Final orders hearing is
frequently docketed 30 days from setting. Time is a critical
factor, and insufficient time may exist for error correction.
Attorney will not assume professional
liability associated with a muck created by a private person or
other counsel. Please do not request mid-litigation
representation - attorney will decline without apology. |
| |
|
Exception. Attorney may consider if client agrees to dismiss
the pending sealing lawsuit without prejudice and commence a new
sealing lawsuit - "cooking from scratch". Counsel would
prepare a new sealing lawsuit within
normal time parameters, but
would not advance such a case on the attorney's calendar simply
due to the client's immediacy needs caused by someone else's
failure to properly commence the sealing lawsuit. Dismissal
and re-filing would cause delay of final orders hearing as well as
duplicate expense - court filing fees, court e-File and Serve
charges, mailing costs, reproduction copy costs, process service,
etc. Appearance and dismissal of the former lawsuit would
increase attorney's fees on an
hourly
fee basis. Counsel has done this before where
the client's former attorney filed sealing pleadings in the wrong
court. If dismissal and re-filing is not acceptable, seek mid-litigation
assistance
elsewhere. |
|
| |
FIND A LAWYER |
|

|
SEALING CRIMINAL RECORDS
DO I NEED AN ATTORNEY? |
 |
|
|
| |
|
Do I need an attorney?
|
|
Sealing Colorado criminal
records - probably time to loosen the pocket book and
hire an attorney when sealing records. |
| |
|
Unless agreed in writing
otherwise at the time of underlying criminal case disposition, it is the
policy of the
District
Attorney's Office to oppose sealing of records in any criminal
case. As with all lawsuits, a person
has a right to represent himself / herself. However, If sealing
criminal justice records is of sufficient importance that you are
considering, it should be done properly. Once final order has
entered, the matter becomes res judicata - you only have one opportunity
to litigate. No "re-do's" if you commit error and
receive an adverse ruling.
You may retain my
services or the services of another attorney, but hire competent counsel. |
|
|
|

|
|
| |
|
Attorney is knowledgeable regarding sealing Colorado criminal justice records, however
he does not practice employment law and therefore will offer no opinion regarding
any employment matter. This denial or consultation or advice includes but is not limited to: |
|
lawful circumstances
under which a background check may be made as a condition of continued
employment or promotion, |
|
pre-screening tool upon
employment application, |
|
availability to law
enforcement or FBI in the course of a security clearance background
check, or use thereof. |
|
| |
|
Similarly attorney will not discuss legality of adverse action taken by
any employer or prospective employer on the basis of information found in
a background check. Not being harsh here - attorney simply is not
competent in the field of employment law. |
| |
|
This notice is provided due to numerous
calls from persons who are not eligible to seal and who want information
regarding employment adverse action or inability to secure employment based upon
prior criminal conviction. Unless your former criminal case meets the
minimum
threshold
to seal criteria, counsel can not provide assistance. |
| |
|
please seek answers to employment
questions
from an attorney who practices in the field of employment law |
FIND
A LAWYER
|
|

|
|
|
Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
PROCURING COURT RECORDS
RECORDS
SEARCH * RECORDS RETRIEVAL |
|
review of the court file
is necessary for attorney to render an opinion
attorney can not
and will not offer advice regarding sealing eligibility until review
of the court file |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A former defendant may contact the relevant
Clerk of Court
(statewide listing) to
procure a copy of entire court file without assistance of counsel. Court
records in El Paso County are ordered via the below form submitted to the
court by fax or by mail. If you physically appear in the records
center, deputy clerks may insist that you submit the form and leave -
subsequent mailing of records to the person making the request. If
outside El Paso County, call
the relevant court during normal business hours.
Minimum threshold -
sealing eligibility criteria. |
| |
|
1. Attorney will not
procure court records on behalf of a prospective client. This is the
prospective client's responsibility.
2. Please provide to counsel the following records from the Clerk of
Court.
a) register of action b) all documents in the court file
c) all minute orders (if any)
Note: El
Paso County request form linked below has this verbiage pre-typed to avoid
error by client or prospective client.
Fax numbers for the courts in El Paso County and Teller County are
pre-printed on the form for your convenience ordering records.
Copies in your
possession (likely partial court file) are insufficient & will be declined.
Please procure the court file if your seek an
opinion regarding eligibility - no
exceptions. |
| |
|
INFORMATION &
LOCATIONS TO REQUEST STATE COURT RECORDS
if you physically appear to procure records, be
prepared for metal detectors at the entrance of each courthouse |
|
|
|
|
District and County Courts in and for El Paso County
Open Monday -
Friday, 8 a.m. - 4 p.m. * * State Court Records Center is
located on the west end of the basement in the
South Tower of the Judicial Complex |
Colorado Springs Municipal
Court Clerk
Open Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. * * Municipal Court Clerk's Office is located
in Room 108 - first floor - east end of the Municipal Courthouse |
|
|

|
| |
|
If provided the
court file and the prospective client provides the court file and is interested in retaining, attorney is willing to review for sealing eligibility under the
following conditions. |
|
a) Prospective
client is looking to retain counsel, not necessarily this attorney,
but nevertheless seeking representation.
b) Prospective client has reviewed, approves and is prepared to
pay attorney
fees and costs, as well as
travel
time, mileage and travel expenses if the case is
outside El Paso County.
c) If the above pre-conditions have not been met, attorney will
decline phone consultation. |
|
| |
|
1. Attorney will
not under any circumstance procure a court file
for a prospective client unless counsel provided representation during the
underlying criminal case.
Procuring a court file is prospective
client's responsibility. If attorney represented in the underlying
criminal case, counsel already has the file.
2. With the
court records, prospective client must provide
his or her name, address, phone and contact email address
3. Do not fax to counsel - faxes will be shredded without review.
4. Do not mail to counsel - hardcopy documents received via US Mail
will be shredded without review.
5. Email court file to:
courtfile@pcisys.net |
|
a) Separate email
box has been established for the limited purpose of court file receipt. Document
submission is confidential * attorney-client privilege.
b) In the subject line, place the word
courtrecords.
If the bypass phrase is not included in the subject line, all email in this box will be filtered - not received, not retrieved
and not reviewed.
c) Please call when email has been sent - attorney will not check this email box
absent phone notice.
d) Do not send .jpg images - .jpg documents are very poor
quality. Send .pdf or .tif files. If you do not have
scanning & conversion capability, take the hardcopy court file to
FedEx-Kinko's, Office Max, Office Depot or another similar
neighborhood store for conversion to an electronic file. Adobe
.pdf format is preferred.
e) Do not send inquiries to this email box. The box
will not be checked absent a phone call. Email would be unknown.
Before sending an email inquiry, please refer to
consultation policy.
Please send email to
INQUIRIES. |
|
| |
|
6. ATTORNEY REVIEW OF COURT
FILE - ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT. |
|
a.
Smaller Court Files - Less than 50 Pages ** most
court files (not all) fall in this category
1. If the court file
is not large and if provided by the prospective client, as part of the
first
consultation counsel would review smaller files (50 pages or
less) for sealing eligibility without billing fees
- no charge.
2. Offer to review smaller court file at no charge is limited to cases within
attorney's
trade area
in which the prospective client has indicated an interest in retaining if
eligible to petition for sealing. If outside attorney's trade area, refer
to ¶ c below. |
|
b.
Larger Court Files - 50 Pages or More.
Hourly
fees would be billed for review of larger files (50+ pages);
prior deposit of $250 would be required; minimum one hour of attorney's time.
If additional time is apparent due to complexity of court case file,
additional deposit would be required. |
|
c. Cases Outside El Paso County.
If outside attorney's
trade area,
please contact
local
counsel
for eligibility assessment and representation. Attorney will
consider court file review and case representation outside his trade area if
prospective client is prepared to incur
travel
time, mileage and expense
- one trip for final hearing would be anticipated.
Travel charts - pre-computed
time & mileage expense. Colorado is a big state
for physical travel - counsel is located in Colorado Springs. A
map is included in
this website for your convenience. Counsel has filed sealing cases in
numerous counties and is most willing to
travel. |
| |
|
7.
SEALING
DRUG CONVICTION CASES. Attorney declines sealing drug
conviction cases for non-clients. Present or former clients please
call attorney for details. |
|
|
|
8. ASSESSMENT
regarding eligibility for sealing criminal justice records will be sent to
you under the terms indicated above.
Counsel sincerely hopes your case is eligible for sealing criminal justice records and
welcomes the opportunity to become your attorney. |
|

| |
|
one trip anticipated
for final orders hearing |
|
|
|
|
Attorney fee options + litigation costs: flat fee
through trial court final orders or hourly fees
at client's discretion. Due to the fact sealing cases
proceed to hearing on the merits regardless of prosecutor position, attorney
offers hourly fees or a flat fee. Settlement flat fee is not neither
relevant nor offered. Litigation costs are not included in fees
- client's obligation. Method of serving the final sealing order
dramatically effects total client expenditure, particularly
costs. The above flat fee
will be honored for sealing cases in El Paso County. Method of final
order service will be considered by attorney in a flat fee quote after
consultation for sealing cases outside El Paso County. Personal
service of the final sealing order takes more time than e-Service of an
electronic copy of the final order. Hourly fees would reflect time
expended if personal service is required. |
| |
hourly fees may be less than offered flat
fees, however are not capped and more likely may exceed offered flat fees
hourly fee option election by client ---
payment of flat fee + estimated costs total trust deposit required to retain
trust deposit overage -
refunded at case conclusion ** undercapitalization
- immediate trust deposit required
CLIENT'S INITIAL ELECTION RE
FLAT FEE OR HOURLY FEES SHALL BE BINDING AND FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
attorney does not accept
installment payments
* full payment
is due at the time attorney is retained
*
major charge cards
accepted |
|
|
|
SEALING CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECORDS
Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES
LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT |
|
|
common
trust deposit
request
District Court Hearing
including attorney's fees &
litigation costs - excluding travel
additional cost deposit may be requested as trial preparation proceeds &
anticipated litigation
expenses solidify |
|
|
|
* this shall not
constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate |
|
|
Out of pocket
litigation cost
expenditures are the client's responsibility - trust deposit is required. |
|
At the time of the first visit, a prospective
client will be given a quote for fees and estimated costs. The quote will be
honored for a period of seven (7) days, after which quotes are subject to
change without notice if this office has not been retained. Fee quote
and costs trust deposit is dependent upon the facts and circumstances of
each individual case. Attorney is a sole
practitioner with need to manage his caseload. Pending proposed client
acceptance and payment, retainer agreement proposals are subject to
withdrawal. Attorney reserves the right to decline any case. Refer to:
a)
first
consultation b)
attorney fees * costs * billings page
c) additional
information. |
|
Client authorization
is obtained
for any large cost expense. Final expenditure may run less or
client
may periodically be asked for additional amounts to be deposited to trust if
fees and costs will exceed previous deposits. |
Client
will be provided with a trust accounting and itemized
billing statement when there has been activity on the account. At the end of
each case, a detailed accounting summary is provided and
remaining trust proceeds are refunded. |
|
trust
deposit for anticipated fees & costs is due when
retained |
|
attorney does not accept installment payments |
|
|
|
|
|
regular billings are
scheduled on the 1st and 15th
if
fees and costs are not paid as agreed, representation is
withdrawn |
|
|
|
MAJOR
CREDIT CARDS ACCEPTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTIAL LIST OF POTENTIAL
COSTS
out of pocket costs are the responsibility of the
client |
|
|
| note:
costs change & below cost information may be obsolete |
|
|
| link to Colorado
Judicial Branch website - current costs
information published by state |
|
|
| litigation costs
fluctuate - not within attorney control |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
e-Service of Regular Copy Final Order Expenses
with 1 Reserve Certified Copy |
| Photocopy expense - final
order by Clerk of Court |
$
7 |
| Court certification - sealing court order
2 copies |
$
30 |
e-Search Colorado state courts
& CBI database after sealing
verification of records non accessibility |
$ 30 |
| Subtotal if costs paid by check or
cash |
$496 |
Charge
card discount
*
expense costs paid by charge card |
$
21
|
Total estimated costs
(ballpark without travel)
Personal service of final sealing order dramatically affects
costs |
$517
|
|
Travel time
and expenses ** |
Rates |
| |
|
- limited
search
pricing - |
|
*
Merchant discount
(costs paid by charge card) may be
avoided by payment of costs trust deposit by check or cash. Attorney's fees
may be paid by charge card with no merchant discount. |
|
Estimated Costs - Final Order Service via
e-File & e-Serve
|
|
|
Client background
search - price may may change - refer to link |
$
60 |
| Search & retrieval fee &
court file copies -
underlying criminal case |
$
25 |
Certification of
deferred sentence agreement & dismissal order or
register of action - underlying criminal case -
Municipal Court only |
$ 30
|
| Court
filing fee - sealing case |
$ 156 |
|
Electronic
File and Serve - sealing case - El Paso County
Notice: If agencies refuse to give an email address & fax e-Service is
required: fax cost incurred of $8 per e-filing plus $0.50 per page per agency.
This may impact cases outside El Paso County. |
$ 80
|
|
Secretarial time - USPS queue
certified mailing initial notice |
$ 35 |
| Photocopy expense - sealing
case documents by attorney |
$ 15 |
| Office supplies |
$
5 |
| Postage |
$ 13 |
| Data CD of attorney file for
client at conclusion of case - optional |
$ 10 |
|
**
Travel
is only applicable if the case is outside Colorado Springs
refer to
travel rates
- one trip for final hearing would be anticipated |
|
|
CAVEAT:
Additional
expenses not identified may be incurred in any individual case; e.g. Fed-X
overnight expense at request of client. Costs
quoted are subject to change by independent providers; actual costs paid by
attorney will
be billed. |
Hopefully you are eligible to seal.
Thank you for considering my services; I
appreciate your inquiry. |
| |
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
|
|
|

| please
feel free to call or email if you are a client or are seeking representation |
|
|
|
 |
INITIAL CONSULTATION TERMS
not an offer for legal advice - refer to link
attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload
attorney reserves the right to decline any legal matter |

|
PRIMARY WEBSITE |
|
| |
|
GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE TOPICAL
WEBSITES |
|
|

|
MAJOR SEARCH
ENGINES
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Serving Colorado Springs Area Zip
Codes |
|
|
| 80918 80920 80919 80917 80915
80908 80132 80909 80913 80916 80921 80922 80925 80901 80902 80903 80904 |
|
80905 80906 80907 80910 80911 80912
80914 80921 80926 80928 80929 80930 80931 80933 80934 80935 80936 |
|
80937 80940 80941 80942 80943 80944 80945
80946 80947 80949 80950 80960 80962 80970 80977 80995 90997 |
|
| |
|
sealing criminal records, Colorado Springs, Colorado, sealing, criminal,
records, seal, criminal records, criminal justice records, records,
offense, felony, misdemeanor, petty offense, records, court records,
prosecution records, law enforcement records, police records, deferred
sentence, guilty plea, court, lawyer, attorney, expungement, expunge |


|
Website Copyright © 2003 -
All Rights Reserved - Document Revised
January 30, 2012
mountains photo image, attorney photo image & law office logo copyright ©
Robert D. Gustafson - all rights reserved - no copyright claimed to other images
Website Initial Publication Date: October 18, 2003 - Republication Date:
July 22, 2011 |
 |
|