Adobe Acrobat Reader
version 5 or later is required to view .pdf files
a. Guilty Plea. When a defendant enters into a deferred sentencing agreement, he / she enters a plea of guilt. Imposition of sentence is delayed during the period of deferment.
b. Period of Deferment. The deferred sentence will be set for a specific period of time - i.e.: six months, one year, eighteen months, two years, etc.
c. Conditions of Deferment. During the deferred sentence, conditions will likely be imposed.
d. Supervision. Deferred sentence may be supervised by the probation department, or it may be unsupervised.
e. Satisfactory Compliance. Upon satisfactory completion of the deferred sentence, the defendant's plea of guilt will be withdrawn and the relevant charges which were deferred will be dismissed. If all charges were deferred, the case itself will be dismissed.
f. Failure to Comply.
The defendant has previously
entered a plea of guilt, therefore the right to trial by jury or trial to
the court has been waived (given up).
The court alone without a
jury would hold a hearing regarding revocation. The sole issue is
whether the defendant complied with all conditions of the deferred
sentence, or whether he / she violated or otherwise failed to comply.
If the Court finds failure to comply, the deferred sentence would be revoked
and a straight conviction would enter.
Upon revocation of deferred
sentence, the court would then impose sentence. The court may impose probation with terms and conditions, or may simply impose a jail sentence. Jail sentence as a condition of probation with other conditions would not be uncommon if a deferred sentence is revoked. Deferred sentence is similar to "one bite out of the apple." When you take a second bite & find half a worm in the apple, you know where the other half is. Comply with the terms of your deferred sentence and file proof with the court
In determining whether a deferred sentence is a "conviction," the key factor to be considered is the legislative intent behind the use of the word in the statute involved. A person who has successfully completed the period of deferred sentence would no longer be "convicted" within the meaning of CRS 16-7-403(2). does not apply. Moreover, CRE 410 would apply to such a situation: "Except as otherwise provided by statutes of the State of Colorado, evidence of a guilty plea, later withdrawn,... to the crime charged or any other crime,... is not admissible in any civil or criminal action, case, or proceeding against the person who made the plea or offer." Thus, evidence of the guilty plea is no longer admissible after successful completion of the period of the deferred sentence. Hafelfinger v. District Court, 674 P.2d 374, 377 Headnote 3 (Colo. 1984). For purposes of the habitual criminal statues, it is evident from the language of the statute that a plea of guilty, a guilty verdict, or a finding of guilt by the trial judge, alone could not effective be used to enhance the punishment for the reason that the conviction process is incomplete. Until there has been an adjudication of guilty the entry of judgment, the fact of guilt has not been judicially declared. People v. Jacquez, 196 Colo. 569, 588 P.2d 871, 873, 874 (1979). On the contrary, in some circumstances, we have considered a guilty plea alone enough to constitute a "conviction": A plea of guilty differs in purpose and effect from a mere admission or an extra-judicial confession; it is in itself a conviction. Like a verdict of a jury it is conclusive. More is not required; the court has nothing to do but give judgment and sentence. Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220, 47 S. Ct. 582, 71 L.Ed. 1009 (1927) (re: possession of firearms). Pursuant to CRS 16-7-403(1) there is a difference between conviction and judgment. A defendant is "convicted" upon the acceptance by the trial court of his guilty plea. A deferred sentence permits a defendant to plead guilty without the entry of a judgment of conviction. People v. Widhalm, 642 P.2d 498, 500 (Colo. 1982). For purposes of eligibility for a personal recognizance bail bond, the Hafelfinger court held the successfully completed deferred sentence constituted a "conviction;" the defendant was ineligible. If DUI charges were later brought arising out of new circumstances, although not admissible in the prosecutor's case in chief, for sentencing purposes a prior offense in which a defendant entered a plea of guilt to a deferred sentence could be considered to be a prior conviction. This exists even though sentence is deferred; the defendant successfully complete all requirements and the plea is later withdrawn. People v. Lichtenwalter, 520 P.2d 583 (Colo. 1974); People v. Cornelison, 616 P.2d 173 (Colo. App. 1980). Unless sealed, records of the law enforcement agency, district attorney and court will reflect the conviction and also reflect dismissal disposition.
Sealing of traffic charges is treated differently than criminal charges. As a general rule, traffic records are excluded and may not be sealed. CRS 24-72-308 and CRS 42-2-121 The DMV is required to keep a separate file of all abstracts of court records regarding dismissals and lesser alcohol offense or non-alcohol offense convictions where the original charges were alcohol or drug related traffic charges, i.e.: DUI, DEAC or DWAI. These separate records are available only to criminal justice agencies. The statute in the above paragraph regarding sealing criminal justice records provides it shall not apply to records pertaining to any class 1 or class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense or to any class A or class B traffic infraction. CRS 24-72-308(3). Given the traffic exception to sealing criminal justice records statute and records required to be kept by the DMV regarding alcohol related traffic charges, in my opinion the court would not seal record of a traffic deferred sentence even after dismissal. Exception - minor with BAC below 0.05.Refer to the Sealing Criminal Justice Records page for more detailed information
Upon successful completion of the period of deferred sentence, you may have the right to file suit in the district court of the county of offense to seal the records. CRS 24-72-308. This is a separate lawsuit a person must bring to seal records; it does not happen automatically upon deferred dismissal. If the records are not sealed, you, persons with your written authorization, law enforcement agents, prosecutors and courts have access to the records. The general public may also have access rights under Colorado Open Records law. Upon sealing of records, you and criminal justice agencies may properly rely that no such records exist. Inspection thereafter may only be permitted by court order after petition by the person who is the subject of the records or by a prosecutor seeking to review the records. CRS 24-72-308(1)(d)&(e). When a defendant has successfully completed the deferred sentence and dismissal is entered, he / she may wish to petition the district court to seal the records. Conviction of a felony or misdemeanor could have sentencing consequences if the person were again charged with a crime of a similar nature, or other consequences if a criminal justice records search is later conducted with written consent for purpose of education, employment or security clearance. Some criminal offenses have been excluded and may not be
sealed. CRS
24-72-308
CRS 18-12-108 weapon prohibition - felony conviction, deferred sentence & misdemeanor or felony domestic violence
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||