GUSTAFSON
LAW
OFFICE
Colorado Springs, Colorado
El Paso County
Robert D. Gustafson
* Attorney at Law *
Colorado Springs |
|
| |
COLORADO SPRINGS ELUDING POLICE
COLORADO SPRINGS VEHICULAR ELUDING |
 |
|
Phone (719) 260-1002
Fax (719) 260-1003 **
Toll Free (800) 410-1002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Felony vehicular eluding and misdemeanor
eluding a police officer - Colorado Springs criminal defense lawyer Robert D.
Gustafson traffic defense trial practice 30+ years in Colorado state and
municipal courts

|
|
BASIC
INFORMATION
please refer to the below links
for basic information regarding defense of criminal & traffic cases |
 |
|
|

ELUDING DEFENSE
ELUDING A POLICE
OFFICER
ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A POLICE
OFFICER
TRAFFIC OFFENSE 12
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
CRS 42-4-1413. Eluding or attempting to elude a police
officer
Any operator of a motor vehicle who the officer has reasonable grounds to
believe has violated a state law or municipal ordinance, who has received a visual or audible signal such as a red light or a siren from a police
officer driving a marked vehicle showing the same to be an official police, sheriff, or Colorado state patrol car directing the operator to bring the
operator's vehicle to a stop, and who willfully increases his or her speed or extinguishes his or her lights in an attempt to elude such police
officer, or willfully attempts in any other manner to elude the police officer, or does elude such police officer commits a class 2 misdemeanor
traffic offense. |
|
|
|

ELUDING DEFENSE
ELUDING A POLICE
OFFICER
ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A POLICE
OFFICER
TRAFFIC OFFENSE 12
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
10.24.109: ELUDING OR ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE POLICE
OFFICER
It shall be unlawful for any operator of a motor vehicle who the officer has reasonable grounds to believe has violated a State law or municipal ordinance, who has received a visual or audible signal such as a red light or a siren from a police officer driving a marked vehicle showing the same to be an official police, sheriff or Colorado State patrol car directing the operator to bring the operator's vehicle to a stop, to wilfully increase the speed or extinguish the lights in an attempt to elude the police officer, or wilfully attempt in any other manner to elude the police officer, or does elude the police officer. (1968 Code §6-24-9; Ord. 75-86; Ord. 81-204; Ord. 01-42) |
| |
| Colorado
Springs Municipal Court Possible Penalties
|
Adult |
Minor |
| Jail |
10 - 90 days |
0 - 10 days |
| Fine |
$10 - $500 |
$10 - $500 |
|
Points
against
Colorado Driving Privileges |
12
Points |
12
Points |
|
| |
Eluding is not defined as a major offense for purpose of
habitual
traffic offender determination.
CRS
42-2-202
However, refer to
DARP Aggravator
criminal court sentencing |

|
|
Surrounding Area
MUNICIPAL COURTS
ELUDING POLICE DEFENSE |
|
|
|
Southern Colorado |
Metro Denver Area |
Colorado
Springs Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Colorado Springs, Colorado |
Calhan Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Calhan, Colorado |
Denver City & County Traffic Court
Traffic Court - Denver, Colorado |
Denver City & County Criminal Court
Criminal Court - Denver, Colorado |
Canon City Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Canon City,
Colorado |
Castle Rock Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Castle
Rock, Colorado |
Aurora Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Aurora, Colorado |
Brighton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Brighton, Colorado |
Cripple Creek Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Cripple
Creek,
Colorado |
Fairplay Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Fairplay, Colorado |
Broomfield Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Broomfield, Colorado |
Centennial Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Centennial, Colorado |
Florence Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Florence, Colorado |
Fountain Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Fountain,
Colorado |
Englewood Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Englewood, Colorado |
Federal Heights Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Federal Heights, Colorado |
Manitou Springs Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Manitou
Springs, Colorado |
Monument Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Monument, Colorado |
Golden Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Golden, Colorado |
Littleton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Littleton,
Colorado |
Palmer Lake Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Palmer
Lake, Colorado |
Pueblo Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Pueblo,
Colorado |
Sheridan Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Sheridan,
Colorado |
Thornton Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Thornton, Colorado |
Simla Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Simla,
Colorado |
Woodland Park Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Woodland
Park,
Colorado |
Wheat Ridge Municipal Court
Municipal Court - Wheat Ridge,
Colorado |
|
|
|
NOTICE: It is the policy of the presiding judge in
Palmer Lake Municipal Court
not to accept negotiated plea settlements. If charges are filed in this
court, counsel must prepare for trial;
trial fees and costs would be quoted.
Municipal courts do not have the
availability of e-Filing as do state district courts, however some of the local
area smaller municipal courts have now come into the 21st century by accepting
pleadings and filings via email and payment of fines and costs via bank on-line
bill pay. Depending upon court policy regarding entry of plea via email
and e-payment subsequent to negotiation without the necessity of physical
appearance,
travel time & mileage
may possibly be avoided. Not all courts permit this.

ELUDING DEFENSE
VEHICULAR
ELUDING
FELONY 12
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
state court only - this crime exceeds the jurisdiction of municipal court
CRS 18-9-116.5. Vehicular eluding
Any person who, while operating a motor vehicle, knowingly eludes or
attempts to elude a peace officer also operating a motor vehicle, and who knows or reasonably should know that he or she is being pursued by said
peace officer, and who operates his or her vehicle in a reckless manner, commits vehicular eluding. Vehicular eluding is a class 5 felony; except
that vehicular eluding which results in bodily injury to another person is a class 4 felony and vehicular eluding which results in death to another
person is a class 3 felony.
Eluding is not defined as a major offense for purpose of
habitual
traffic offender determination.
CRS
42-2-202
However, refer to
DARP Aggravator
criminal court sentencing

CRS
42-2-206 Driving after revocation prohibited.
State
Statutes - CRS
(b) (I) A person commits the crime of aggravated driving with a revoked
license if he or she is found to be an habitual offender and thereafter operates a motor vehicle in this state while the revocation of the
department prohibiting such operation is in effect and, as a part of the same criminal episode, also commits any of the following offenses:
(D) Eluding or attempting to elude a police officer, as described in section 42-4-1413;
(F) Vehicular eluding, as described in section 18-9-116.5, C.R.S.
Refer to
CRS 42-2-206 for the
entire statute

CRS 16-13-303. Class 1 public
nuisance.
State Statutes - CRS
(1)(j) Used in the commission of
felony vehicular eluding pursuant to section 18-9-116.5, C.R.S.;
(2) All fixtures and contents of any building, structure, vehicle, or
real property which is a class 1 public nuisance under subsection (1) of this section and all property which is a class 1 public nuisance under
subsection (1.5) of this section are subject to seizure, confiscation, and forfeiture as provided in this part 3. In addition, the personal
property of every kind and description, including currency and other negotiable instruments and vehicles, used in conducting, maintaining,
aiding, or abetting any class 1 public nuisance is subject to seizure, confiscation, and forfeiture, as provided in this part 3.

|
|
WHAT
IS THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN MISDEMEANOR & FELONY ELUDING? |
|
|
Essentially -
reckless
driving.
One may be said to be guilty of wanton behavior when, although the defendant may not have deliberately intended to injure anyone, he consciously chooses a dangerous course of action which to a reasonable mind creates a strong probability that injury to others will result.
Martin v. People, 179 Colo. 237, 499 P.2d 606 (1972).
One who commits reckless driving necessarily has been guilty of careless driving, for the greater degree of negligence includes the lesser.
People v. Chapman, 192 Colo. 322, 557 P.2d 1211 (1977). This means
careless driving is a "lesser included offense" of reckless driving,
and if charged with reckless, a defendant may request a jury instruction on
careless. Reckless driving is a "lesser included offense of vehicular
eluding. People v. Pena, 962 P.2d 285 (Colo. App. 1997).
Both reckless and careless driving offenses consist of two elements: (1) the act of driving a motor vehicle, and (2) the state of mind in "disregard" of or "without due regard" for safety.
People v. Chapman, 192 Colo. 322, 557 P.2d 1211 (1977).
The two offenses differ only in that the degree of negligence required is far more culpable in reckless driving than in careless driving, although it falls short of intentional wrongdoing.
id.
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
The felony has aggravators for vehicular eluding which results in bodily injury to another person
(class 4 felony) and
for vehicular eluding which results in death to another
person (class 3 felony).
Bodily Injury means physical pain, illness,
or any impairment of physical or mental condition
Source: COLJI 5(5), CRS
18-1-901(3)(c)
Attorney Note: no specific
degree of pain is required under the definition.

ELUDING DEFENSE
WILDLIFE OFFICERS OR
PARK
& REC DEPARTMENT
ELUDING OR ATTEMPTING TO
ELUDE OFFICER
TRAFFIC OFFENSE 10
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
state court only - these crimes are violations of state statutes, not municipal
ordinances
CRS 33-6-111. Inspection of license and wildlife
- check stations - failure to
tag - eluding an officer.
(1) Any person who hunts, traps, fishes, or possesses wildlife for any
purpose shall produce all applicable licenses issued to him by the division, all firearms, all records required to be maintained by articles 1
to 6 of this title or by any rule or regulation of the commission, all wildlife, and any personal identification documents when requested to do so
by a district wildlife manager or other peace officer, as defined in section 33-1-102(32) empowered to enforce articles 1 to 6 of this title.
Any person who refuses to permit inspection of such personal identification documents, licenses, firearms, records, or wildlife is guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of fifty dollars and an assessment of five license suspension points.
(2) The division is authorized to establish check stations, as needed, at
locations within the state to aid in the management of wildlife and the enforcement of articles 1 to 6 of this title and the rules or regulations
of the commission. Persons who encounter check stations, whether in possession of wildlife or not, shall stop and produce licenses issued by
the division, firearms, and wildlife for inspection by division personnel. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon
conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of one hundred dollars and an assessment of five license suspension points.
(3) Any person who fails to void his license or carcass tag as required by
commission rule or regulation is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of fifty dollars and an
assessment of ten license suspension points.
(4) It is unlawful for any person to elude or attempt to elude by any
means a Colorado wildlife officer or other peace officer after having received a visual or audible signal such as a red or red and blue light,
siren, or voice command directing him to stop. Any person who violates this subsection (4) is guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof,
shall be punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars and an assessment of
ten license suspension
points. In addition, the court shall require the person to
pay for any damages caused to any public or private real or personal property damaged
while eluding an officer.
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
CRS 33-15-105. Eluding
It is unlawful for any person to elude or attempt to elude by any means a
parks and recreation officer or other commissioned officer of the division
after having received a visual or audible signal such as a red or red and blue light, a siren, or a voice command directing him to stop. Any person
who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a
fine of three hundred dollars.

ELUDING POLICE &
VEHICULAR ELUDING
POTENTIAL DEFENSES
ELUDING OR ATTEMPTING TO
ELUDE
|
| TRAFFIC OFFENSE OR FELONY |
| 12
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-
Jurisdictional
attack - refer to link for information
DUI case
Attack the jurisdiction
(power) of
the court in the pending criminal case
Jurisdictional attack may be
an important concept in defense of any given eluding case
-
Lack of reasonable suspicion for
initial attempted contact by the law enforcement officer
-
Lack of probable cause for
warrantless arrest or seizure of the defendant's person
-
Color of authority - peace
officer acting within course & scope of his or her employment.
-
Unlawful extra-jurisdictional
arrest
-
Defendant's admissions the
result of undue influence, duress and coercion - due process violation
-
Defendant's admissions taken in
violation of
5th Amendment privilege
against self incrimination
6th Amendment right to legal
counsel
-
Alleged offense did not occur on
public roadway or highway? - sorry, won't work in eluding cases
-
Driving
A third person, not
defendant, was driving a motor vehicle
-
Officer observations - what
didn't he observe which a jury member might expect? What was the
officer's opportunity to observe? - lighting, time spent, temperature,
etc.
-
Officer credibility.
Experience with traffic enforcement and training, over concern with conviction
statistics, a cop's cop or an average Joe doing a job, would the jury
members want this particular officer stopping him / her? Has the
officer overstated his / her observations in relation to the driving
behavior? How
well was the stop and investigation conducted?
-
Eluding is a factual determination based upon the
circumstances of the case. The case may turn upon factual argument
regarding the facts - defendant's conduct & driving pattern and officer
conduct.
-
Reasonable doubt - state proof
beyond a reasonable doubt
-
Cloak of innocence and burden of
proof upon state - beyond a reasonable doubt. A defendant is not
required to prove innocence - the state must prove guilt.
-
When all else fails:
-
Trial lawyer's adage:
If the facts are on your
side - pound the facts.
If the law is on your
side - pound the law.
If neither the facts nor
the law are on your side - pound the table !
|


|
|
|
Driving in Colorado is a constitutionally protected privilege, but
nevertheless a privilege which may be lost. Multiple statutes
can cause loss of driving privileges for different driver behavior.
Drivers are entitled to a
DMV hearing. In some circumstances the right to
hearing precedes potential DMV adverse action; under other Colorado
traffic laws the adverse order is entered, then the driver is provided
notice of the adverse action and right to request subsequent hearing.
If hearing has been held or a DMV final order has otherwise entered
and the Colorado driver's license or Colorado driving privileges have
been suspended, revoked or denied, the driver's remaining recourse is
appeal to the
District Court.
DMV appeal is subject to a
statute of limitations. Right to
appeal may be lost if the driver delays. Upon final order in the
District Court, either party make take the case on appeal to the
Colorado Court of Appeals. Refer to links for
information. |
|
|
DMV
Addresses and Links |
Driving Abstracts and Records |
DMV Point Structure |
On-Line Colorado Driving
Records |
|
Driver License & Hearing Defense |
DMV Appeal |
Legal
Research |
Selected Statutes & Regs |
"Red"
License & Interlock Devices |
|
Insurance Actions |
SR-22 Insurance |
Habitual Traffic Offender |
Interstate Compact |
Accident Reports & DMV Forms |
| |
State of Colorado accident report obsolete 8/4/04 *
police now verify insurance at the accident scene
refer to above link for information, forms, state on-line accident report
and CSPD Cold Report |
| |
|
Under Colorado
law, if the insurance information of a driver was not included in a law
enforcement traffic accident report, a
Colorado State Accident Report
must be submitted to the
DMV
within 10 days of an accident. CRS 42-4-1609 Also by statute, statements by a
driver in the accident report may not be used in conjunction with any court
proceedings, criminal or civil, except that the
DMV
may disclose the identity of a person involved in an accident when such identity
is not otherwise known or when such person denies his or her presence at such
accident. CRS 42-4-1610, CRS 42-7-504. The primary
purpose of filing the accident report is to comply with state law, and to
provide evidence of insurance on the vehicle - thereby avoiding an
FRA
suspension.- refer to link for information. If any of the below
charges are alleged, a driver should consult with his or her defense attorney
regarding exercise of constitutional privileges before making any oral or
written statement. |
| |
|
Adobe Acrobat Reader
version 5 or later is required to view Colorado DMV forms & CSPD cold report .pdf files
Free Download |
|
Colorado State Accident Report
on-line |
Colorado State Accident Report
hardcopy |
Evidence of Insurance |
|
FRA - Waiver of Security - Financial Responsibility |
FRA - Release from Liability |
Affidavit of Financial Responsibility |
|
Affidavit - Out of State Residency - FRA SR-22 Avoidance |
Promissory Note Contract |
Other
DMV forms |
|
|
|
|

|
INDEPENDENT SERVICE PROVIDERS
private investigators * process service
* laboratories * transcription
refer to attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine |
ADVICE
BY LAYMEN
forewarned is forearmed
advice by unsupervised paralegals
& street corner lawyers |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |

|
ELUDING DEFENSE
DO I NEED AN ATTORNEY? |
 |
|
|
| |
|
Do I need an attorney?
|
Probably time to loosen the pocket book and
hire a
defense attorney.
|
| |
|
If you are charged with
misdemeanor eluding police or felony vehicular eluding, it is advisable to retain competent
legal counsel. These are serious charges. The misdemeanor charge
carries potential
county jail sentence and the felony charge carries
potential
prison sentence. Each offense carries
12 points - suspension of driver's license or Colorado driving
privileges. Vehicle insurance consequences could also be
anticipated. You may retain my
services or the services of another attorney, but hire competent defense counsel.
|
|
|
|
If convicted of either
eluding offense, you could anticipate policy termination or
significant increase in your insurance premiums - probably over a
period of 3 - 5 years.
Contact your insurance company underwriters to learn more of the
potential consequences. |
|

|
|
|
ATTORNEY'S
FEES AND COSTS
MISDEMEANOR ELUDING POLICE
**
FELONY VEHICULAR ELUDING
Colorado Traffic
Defense and Criminal Defense Trial Practice 30+ Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the time of the first visit, a prospective
client will be given a quote for fees and estimated costs. The quote will
be honored for a period of seven (7) days, after which quotes are subject to change
without notice if this office has not been retained. Fee quote and costs
trust deposit is dependent upon the facts and circumstances of each individual
case. Attorney fee options + litigation costs: 1)
hourly attorney fees only 2)
settlement flat fee with trailing trial flat fee 3) trial flat fee only
4) hourly fees or flat fee at client's discretion. Attorney determines
options to be offered. Litigation costs are not included in fees -
client's obligation. Attorney is a sole
practitioner with need to manage his caseload. Pending proposed client
acceptance and payment, retainer agreement proposals are subject to
withdrawal. Attorney reserves the right to decline any case. Refer to:
a)
first
consultation b)
attorney fees * costs * billings page
c) additional
information.
|
|
POTENTIAL FEE
QUOTE
MISDEMEANOR
ELUDING POLICE
STATE COURT OR MUNICIPAL COURT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
hourly fees may be less than offered flat
fees, however are not capped and more likely may exceed offered flat fees
hourly fee option election by client ---
payment of flat fee + estimated costs total trust deposit required to retain
trust deposit overage -
refunded at case conclusion ** undercapitalization
- immediate trust deposit required
CLIENT'S INITIAL ELECTION RE
FLAT FEE OR HOURLY FEES SHALL BE BINDING AND FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
attorney does not accept
installment payments
* full payment
is due at the time attorney is retained
*
major charge cards
accepted |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
| |
MISDEMEANOR
ELUDING POLICE
TRIAL OR CONTESTED PROCEEDINGS
Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES
LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT |
|
|
common
trust deposit
request
including attorney's fees &
litigation costs - excluding travel
settlement attorney fees paid would be
deducted from trial attorney fees due
additional cost deposit may be requested as trial preparation proceeds &
anticipated litigation
expenses solidify |
|
|
|
* this shall not
constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate |
|
|
|
use of
professional services
or expert witnesses will significantly effect litigation cost
expenditure - client's responsibility |
|
Client authorization
is obtained
for any large cost expense. Final expenditure may run less or
client
may periodically be asked for additional amounts to be deposited to trust if
fees and costs will exceed previous deposits. |
Client
will be provided with a trust accounting and itemized
billing statement when there has been activity on the account. At the end of
each case, a detailed accounting summary is provided and
remaining trust proceeds are refunded. |
|
trust
deposit for anticipated fees & costs is due when
retained |
|
attorney does not accept installment payments |
|
|
|
|
|
regular billings are
scheduled on the 1st and 15th
if
fees and costs are not paid as agreed, representation is
withdrawn |
|
|
|
MAJOR
CREDIT CARDS ACCEPTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTIAL LIST OF POTENTIAL
COSTS
out of pocket costs are the responsibility of the
client |
|
|
| note:
costs change & below cost information may be obsolete |
|
|
| link to Colorado
Judicial Branch website - current costs
information published by state |
|
|
| direct link to
criminal or traffic court costs - costs change &
lists may be obsolete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given allegations of eluding,
it would be prudent to place law enforcement 911 *
dispatch tapes and records, plus other
law enforcement
records under subpoena duces tecum. Expense will depend upon the amount
of time the
law enforcement agency
spends searching dispatch tapes and records. Similarly, it would be
prudent to have all law enforcement officers and witnesses interviewed by
a
private investigator. |
CAVEAT:
Not all above costs will be relevant to any given case, and additional
expenses not identified may be incurred in any individual case. Costs
quoted are subject to change by independent providers; actual costs paid will
be billed. limited
search
pricing |
| |
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
|
|
|
|
|
POTENTIAL FEE
QUOTE
FELONY VEHICULAR ELUDING
NON INJURY AND NOT RESULTING IN DEATH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
hourly fees may be less than offered flat
fees, however are not capped and more likely may exceed offered flat fees
hourly fee option election by client ---
payment of flat fee + estimated costs total trust deposit required to retain
trust deposit overage -
refunded at case conclusion ** undercapitalization
- immediate trust deposit required
CLIENT'S INITIAL ELECTION RE
FLAT FEE OR HOURLY FEES SHALL BE BINDING AND FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
attorney does not accept
installment payments
* full payment
is due at the time attorney is retained
*
major charge cards
accepted |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
| |
FELONY VEHICULAR ELUDING
Non-Injury and Not Resulting in Death
TRIAL OR CONTESTED PROCEEDINGS
Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES
LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT |
|
|
common
trust deposit
request
including attorney's fees &
litigation costs - excluding travel
settlement attorney fees paid would be
deducted from trial attorney fees due
additional cost deposit may be requested as trial preparation proceeds &
anticipated litigation
expenses solidify |
|
|
|
* this shall not
constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate |
|
|
|
use of
professional services
or expert witnesses will significantly effect litigation cost
expenditure - client's responsibility |
|
Costs:
refer to costs identified above;
additional costs likely to be incurred
private investigator fees and costs will likely exceed that noted in the misdemeanor costs section above |
|
|
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
|
|
|
|
|
POTENTIAL FEE
QUOTE
FELONY VEHICULAR ELUDING
RESULTING IN BODILY INJURY OR DEATH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because
relevant facts can vary so widely in vehicular eluding -
injury or death cases, It is not possible to
"ballpark" a flat fee or costs estimate for this type of
case. The attorney
would need to know more about the facts and circumstances
before offering a settlement or trial flat fee quote or an
estimate of litigation costs. |
Costs:
refer to costs identified above;
additional costs likely to be incurred
private investigator fees and costs will significantly exceed that noted in the misdemeanor costs section above |
|
use of
professional services
or expert witnesses will significantly effect litigation cost
expenditure - client's responsibility |
| |
hourly fees may be less than offered flat
fees, however are not capped and more likely may exceed offered flat fees
hourly fee option election by client ---
payment of flat fee + estimated costs total trust deposit required to retain
trust deposit overage -
refunded at case conclusion ** undercapitalization
- immediate trust deposit required
CLIENT'S INITIAL ELECTION RE
FLAT FEE OR HOURLY FEES SHALL BE BINDING AND FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
attorney does not accept
installment payments
* full payment
is due at the time attorney is retained
*
major charge cards
accepted |
|
|
|
| |
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
|
|
|
|
|
POTENTIAL FEE
QUOTE
ELUDING
WILDLIFE OFFICER OR PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OFFICER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
hourly fees may be less than offered flat
fees, however are not capped and more likely may exceed offered flat fees
hourly fee option election by client ---
payment of flat fee + estimated costs total trust deposit required to retain
trust deposit overage -
refunded at case conclusion ** undercapitalization
- immediate trust deposit required
CLIENT'S INITIAL ELECTION RE
FLAT FEE OR HOURLY FEES SHALL BE BINDING AND FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
attorney does not accept
installment payments
* full payment
is due at the time attorney is retained
*
major charge cards
accepted |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
| |
ELUDING
Wildlife
Officer or Park & Recreation Department Officer
TRIAL OR CONTESTED PROCEEDINGS
Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
ATTORNEY FEES
LITIGATION COSTS DEPOSIT |
|
|
common
trust deposit
request
including attorney's fees &
litigation costs - excluding
travel
settlement attorney fees paid would be
deducted from trial attorney fees due
additional cost deposit may be requested as trial preparation proceeds &
anticipated litigation
expenses solidify |
|
|
|
* this shall not
constitute an offer, nor be construed as a binding estimate |
|
|
|
use of
professional services
or expert witnesses will significantly effect litigation cost
expenditure - client's responsibility |
|
Costs:
refer to costs identified above |
|
|
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
|
|
|
|
|
POTENTIAL FEE QUOTE
DOR * DMV LICENSE HEARING
SUSPENSION
**
REVOCATION
**
DENIAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Colorado Springs Attorney Robert D. Gustafson
common quote -
limited flat fee |
$750 |
|
|
|
not applicable to
habitual traffic offender
license
revocation hearing
this shall neither constitute an offer, nor be
construed as a binding estimate
DMV limited flat fee would be dependent upon the
facts and circumstances of the case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A DMV limited flat fee would likely be
offered. Additional hours necessitated by
continuance requested by police or by subpoena procurement are billed at
hourly rates. A client may retain the attorney's services in a DUI or
traffic criminal case without asking for
assistance at
DMV proceedings. Attorney does not undertake representation in
DMV proceedings until the DMV limited flat fee has been paid, and full payment is required
at least *seven (7) days in advance of hearing. Fees beyond the DMV limited
flat fee would be
unusual. |
|
|
|
Attorney will initially
make an option offer of 1.) billing to be upon hourly fees, or in the
alternative, 2.) quote of a hearing flat fee per above. Offered
fee options will be up to the client, however client's initial election will be
final. Hourly fee billings are based solely upon time, and may be more
or less than the offered flat fee. Hourly fees are not capped at
the limited flat fee. Attorney reserves the right to quote hourly fees only without a
flat fee offer. Attorney
reserves the right to decline any case. |
|
|
|
*
Applicable case law, statutes, rules of civil
procedure, and Department of Revenue or Department of Health regulations
contain mandatory time constraints, are complex and are generally
unfavorable to the driver. The above
7 day hiring limitation is based solely upon client control over fees
paid at time attorney is retained in the criminal case and upon
avoidance & resolution of attorney calendar conflicts.
Prospective clients are notified 7 days is insufficient time to prepare
an adequate license hearing defense which involves DMV discovery or DOR
issuance of subpoena (compelling testimony) or subpoena duces tecum
(compelling testimony & production of documents or evidence).
Delay in retaining attorney may prejudice the defense. Whether the
underlying basis is alcohol related or not, time is critical in DOR hearings
regarding suspension, revocation or denial of Colorado driving
privileges. |
|
|
|
DOR
hearing fee Estimate Caveats.
If
collateral attack is required, the
attorney would need to know more about the number and locations of
underlying court cases to be attacked before offering a DOR hearing
fee.
Legal research and research time
would increase the estimates. |
|
|
| |
| |
| ****************************** |
****************************** |
****************************** |
|
|
|

| please
feel free to call or email if you are a client or are seeking representation |
|
|
|
 |
INITIAL CONSULTATION TERMS
not an offer for legal advice - refer to link
attorney is a sole practitioner with need to manage his caseload
attorney reserves the right to decline any legal matter |

|
PRIMARY WEBSITE |
|
| |
|
GUSTAFSON LAW OFFICE TOPICAL
WEBSITES |
|
|

|
MAJOR SEARCH
ENGINES
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Serving Colorado Springs Area Zip
Codes |
|
|
| 80918 80920 80919 80917 80915
80908 80132 80909 80913 80916 80921 80922 80925 80901 80902 80903 80904 |
|
80905 80906 80907 80910 80911 80912
80914 80921 80926 80928 80929 80930 80931 80933 80934 80935 80936 |
|
80937 80940 80941 80942 80943 80944 80945
80946 80947 80949 80950 80960 80962 80970 80977 80995 90997 |
|
| |
|
eluding, vehicular eluding, eluding police, eluding police officer, police officer, peace officer, vehicle, felony, misdemeanor, traffic,
ticket, traffic ticket, criminal, criminal defense, traffic defense,
Colorado Springs Municipal Court, Colorado state courts, defenses,
discovery, information, Manitou Springs Municipal Court, Woodland Park
Municipal Court, Cripple Creek Creek Municipal Court, Fountain Municipal
Court, Calhan Municipal Court, Simla Municipal Court, Pueblo Municipal Court,
Castle Rock Municipal Court, Monument Municipal Court, Palmer Lake Municipal Court, Municipal Court
Colorado Springs Colorado, Municipal Court Manitou Springs Colorado,
Municipal Court Woodland Park Colorado, Municipal Court Cripple Creek
Colorado, Municipal Court Fountain Colorado, Municipal Court Calhan
Colorado, Court Calhan Colorado, Municipal Court Simla Colorado, Town of Simla Colorado,
Court Simla Colorado, Municipal Court Pueblo Colorado,
Municipal Court Castle Rock Colorado, Calhan Colorado, Simla Colorado,
Municipal Court Monument Colorado, Municipal Court Palmer Lake Colorado,
Municipal Court Denver Colorado, Municipal Court Aurora Colorado,
Municipal Court Brighton Colorado, Municipal Court Broomfield Colorado,
Municipal Court Centennial Colorado, Municipal Court Englewood Colorado,
Municipal Court Federal Heights Colorado, Municipal Court Golden Colorado,
Municipal Court Littleton Colorado, Municipal Court Sheridan Colorado,
Municipal Court Thornton Colorado, Municipal Court Wheat Ridge Colorado,
Municipal Court WheatRidge Colorado, Colorado Springs, El Paso County,
Colorado, court, lawyer, attorney |


|
Website Copyright © 2003 -
All Rights Reserved - Document Revised
January 30, 2012
mountains photo image, attorney photo image & law office logo copyright ©
Robert D. Gustafson - all rights reserved - no copyright claimed to other images
Website Initial Publication Date: October 18, 2003 - Republication Date:
July 22, 2011 |
 |
|